Impact of the high-definition multileaf collimator on linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery

被引:34
作者
Tanyi, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Kato, C. M. [3 ]
Chen, Y. [4 ]
Chen, Z. [5 ]
Fuss, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Radiat Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Nucl Engn & Radiat Hlth Phys, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Macalester Coll, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Oregon Clin & Translat Res Inst, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOSURGERY; MLC LEAF WIDTH; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; TREATMENT PLANS; SKULL-BASE; LESIONS; SYSTEM; IMRT;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/19726857
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: The impact of two multileaf collimator (MLC) systems for linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was assessed. Methods: 68 lesions formed the basis of this study. 2.5 mm leaf width plans served as reference. Comparative plans, with identical planning parameters, were based on a 5 mm leaf width MLC system. Two collimation strategies, with collimation fixed at 0 degrees or 90 degrees and optimised per arc or beam, were also assessed. Dose computation was based on the pencil beam algorithm with allowance for tissue heterogeneity. Plan normalisation was such that 100% of the prescription dose covered 95% of the planning target volume. Plan evaluation was based on target coverage and normal tissue avoidance criteria. Results: The median conformity index difference between the MLC systems ranged between 0.8% and 14.2%; the 2.5 mm MLC exhibited better dose conformation. The median reduction of normal tissue exposed to >= 100%, >= 50% and >= 25% of the prescription dose ranged from 13.4% to 29.7%, favouring the 2.5 mm MLC system. Dose fall-off was steeper for the 2.5 mm MLC system with an overall median absolute difference ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 mm. The use of collimation optimisation resulted in a decrease in differences between the MLC systems. The results demonstrated the dosimetric merit of the 2.5 mm leaf width MLC system over the 5 mm leaf width system, albeit small, for the investigated range of intracranial SRS targets. Conclusion: The clinical significance of these results warrants further investigation to determine whether the observed dosimetric advantages translate into outcome improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 638
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial [J].
Andrews, DW ;
Scott, CB ;
Sperduto, PW ;
Flanders, AE ;
Gaspar, LE ;
Schell, MC ;
Werner-Wasik, M ;
Demas, W ;
Ryu, J ;
Bahary, JP ;
Souhami, L ;
Rotman, M ;
Mehta, MP ;
Curran, WJ .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9422) :1665-1672
[2]   Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy vs. stereotactic conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of meningioma located predominantly in the skull base [J].
Baumert, BG ;
Norton, IA ;
Davis, JB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (02) :580-592
[3]   What is the optimum leaf width of a multileaf collimator? [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Oelfke, U ;
Nill, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (11) :2494-2502
[4]   Effect of MLC leaf width on the planning and delivery of SMLC IMRT using the CORVUS inverse treatment planning system [J].
Burmeister, J ;
McDermott, PN ;
Bossenberger, T ;
Ben-Josef, E ;
Levin, K ;
Forman, JD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (12) :3187-3193
[5]   A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; arcs vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation [J].
Cardinale, RM ;
Benedict, SH ;
Wu, QW ;
Zwicker, RD ;
Gaballa, HE ;
Mohan, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :431-436
[6]   EFFECT OF MLC LEAF WIDTH AND PTV MARGIN ON THE TREATMENT PLANNING OF INTENSITY-MODULATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (IMSRS) OR RADIOTHERAPY (IMSRT) [J].
Chang, Jenghwa ;
Yenice, Kamil M. ;
Jiang, Kailiu ;
Hunt, Margie ;
Narayana, Ashwatha .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (02) :110-116
[7]   Dosimetric characteristics of Novalis Tx system with high definition multileaf collimator [J].
Chang, Zheng ;
Wang, Zhiheng ;
Wu, Q. Jackie ;
Yan, Hui ;
Bowsher, Jim ;
Zhang, Junan ;
Yin, Fang-Fang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) :4460-4463
[8]  
CHERN S, 2006, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V15, P76
[9]   Comparative dosimetric study of three-dimensional conformal, dynamic conformal arc, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for brain tumor treatment using novalis system [J].
Ding, Meisong ;
Newman, Francis ;
Kavanagh, Brian D. ;
Stuhr, Kelly ;
Johnson, Tim K. ;
Gaspar, Laurie E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04) :S82-S86
[10]   DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN 3DCRT AND IMRT USING DIFFERENT MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS IN THE TREATMENT OF BRAIN TUMORS [J].
Ding, Meisong ;
Newman, Francis ;
Chen, Changhu ;
Stuhr, Kelly ;
Gaspar, Laurie E. .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (01) :1-8