Conceptual bases for environmental compensation under the ecological approach

被引:4
|
作者
Bonilla, Fabian [1 ]
Monros, Juan S. [3 ]
Sasa, Mahmood [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Inst Clodomiro Picado, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Costa Rica, Ctr Invest Biodiversidad & Ecol Trop, Museo Zool, San Jose, Costa Rica
[3] Univ Valencia, Inst Cavanilles Biodiversidad & Biol Evolut, Valencia, Spain
[4] Org Estudios Trop, San Jose, Costa Rica
关键词
environment; biodiversity; ecological equivalence; economic equivalence; environmental evaluation; NO NET LOSS; BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; EQUIVALENCY ANALYSIS; MITIGATION BANKING; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.15517/rev.biol.trop.2022.52281
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction: Infrastructure projects or development activities often generate a loss of biodiversity and reduce the quality of the environment's services to human societies. Fortunately, many of these impacts can be reduced, controlled, or compensated through mitigation, rehabilitation, and compensation measures, which usually rely on the environmental legal framework of the countries or states where they are implemented. This review provides a theoretical vision of using environmental compensation as a legal/technical instrument integrated into natural environment management.Methodology: We reviewed the global literature on the subject using the GoogleScholar and SciELO reference search engines using various indicators in English and Spanish.Results: We found 244 references on environmental compensation, showing a clear increasing pattern in the last decade. Environmental compensation constitutes a legal/technical instrument that allows offsets for environmen-tal losses and often is part of the Environmental Impact Studies regulated by the state. Several methodological strategies are used to establish compensatory actions, each of them based on one of four possible approaches: economic, ecological, political, and cultural. The ecological equivalence between the impacted environmental elements and compensation is sought within the ecological approach, ensuring no net loss. Thus, this approach allows the incorporation of multiple criteria for the evaluation of damage and compensation actions: it can be applied in different situations. Nevertheless, compensatory measures are not exempt from criticism. There are situations in which the singularity of the impacted elements makes an adequate compensation for losses impossible.Conclusions: Compensation is highly relevant in environmental management and must favor the universal right to a healthy environment. However, its practical application requires clear procedures and close vigilance to prevent losses or even a net environmental gain.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A straightforward conceptual approach for evaluating spatial conservation priorities under climate change
    Loyola, Rafael D.
    Lemes, Priscila
    Nabout, Joao Carlos
    Trindade-Filho, Joaquim
    Sagnori, Maira Dalia
    Dobrovolski, Ricardo
    Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre F.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2013, 22 (02) : 483 - 495
  • [32] Can environmental compensation contribute to socially equitable conservation? The case of an ecological fiscal transfer in the Brazilian Atlantic forest
    Selva, Gracie Verde
    Pauli, Natasha
    Kim, Milena Kiatkoski
    Clifton, Julian
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 24 (10) : 931 - 948
  • [33] Ecological compensation: From general guidance and expertise to specific proposals for road developments
    Villarroya, Ana
    Persson, Jesper
    Puig, Jordi
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2014, 45 : 54 - 62
  • [34] Using Environmental Litigation to Advance Ecological Restoration under the Convention on Biological Diversity in China
    Rong, Zhenzhen
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2023, 7 (01) : 100 - 130
  • [35] Operationalisation of ecological compensation - Obstacles and ways forward
    Blicharska, Malgorzata
    Hedblom, Marcus
    Josefsson, Jonas
    Widenfalk, Olof
    Ranius, Thomas
    Ockinger, Erik
    Widenfalk, Lina A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 304
  • [36] Environmental assessment in a shallow subtidal rocky habitat: approach coupling chemical and ecological tools
    Saez, Claudio A.
    Perez-Matus, Alejandro
    Gabriela Lobos, M.
    Oliva, Doris
    Vasquez, Julio A.
    Bravo, Manuel
    CHEMISTRY AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [37] Conceptual guidelines for the implementation of the ecosystem approach in biodiversity monitoring
    Mueller, Melanie
    Geist, Juergen
    ECOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (05):
  • [38] Conceptual Reflection on Responsive Environmental Governance
    Hyle, Maija Anneli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 39 (08) : 610 - 619
  • [39] Ecological effects of environmental change
    Luque, Gloria M.
    Hochberg, Michael E.
    Holyoak, Marcel
    Hossaert, Martine
    Gaill, Francoise
    Courchamp, Franck
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 : 1 - 3
  • [40] Cost Analysis of a Novel Method for Ecological Compensation-A Study of the Translocation of Dead Wood
    Lindroos, Ola
    Soderlind, Malin
    Jensen, Joel
    Hjalten, Joakim
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)