Conceptual bases for environmental compensation under the ecological approach

被引:4
|
作者
Bonilla, Fabian [1 ]
Monros, Juan S. [3 ]
Sasa, Mahmood [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Inst Clodomiro Picado, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Costa Rica, Ctr Invest Biodiversidad & Ecol Trop, Museo Zool, San Jose, Costa Rica
[3] Univ Valencia, Inst Cavanilles Biodiversidad & Biol Evolut, Valencia, Spain
[4] Org Estudios Trop, San Jose, Costa Rica
关键词
environment; biodiversity; ecological equivalence; economic equivalence; environmental evaluation; NO NET LOSS; BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; EQUIVALENCY ANALYSIS; MITIGATION BANKING; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.15517/rev.biol.trop.2022.52281
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction: Infrastructure projects or development activities often generate a loss of biodiversity and reduce the quality of the environment's services to human societies. Fortunately, many of these impacts can be reduced, controlled, or compensated through mitigation, rehabilitation, and compensation measures, which usually rely on the environmental legal framework of the countries or states where they are implemented. This review provides a theoretical vision of using environmental compensation as a legal/technical instrument integrated into natural environment management.Methodology: We reviewed the global literature on the subject using the GoogleScholar and SciELO reference search engines using various indicators in English and Spanish.Results: We found 244 references on environmental compensation, showing a clear increasing pattern in the last decade. Environmental compensation constitutes a legal/technical instrument that allows offsets for environmen-tal losses and often is part of the Environmental Impact Studies regulated by the state. Several methodological strategies are used to establish compensatory actions, each of them based on one of four possible approaches: economic, ecological, political, and cultural. The ecological equivalence between the impacted environmental elements and compensation is sought within the ecological approach, ensuring no net loss. Thus, this approach allows the incorporation of multiple criteria for the evaluation of damage and compensation actions: it can be applied in different situations. Nevertheless, compensatory measures are not exempt from criticism. There are situations in which the singularity of the impacted elements makes an adequate compensation for losses impossible.Conclusions: Compensation is highly relevant in environmental management and must favor the universal right to a healthy environment. However, its practical application requires clear procedures and close vigilance to prevent losses or even a net environmental gain.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating ecological equivalence for native vegetation compensation: A methodological approach
    de Mello, Kaline
    Fendrich, Arthur Nicolaus
    Borges-Matos, Clarice
    Brites, Alice Dantas
    Tavares, Paulo Andre
    Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
    Matsumoto, Marcelo
    Rodrigues, Ricardo Ribeiro
    Joly, Carlos Alfredo
    Sparovek, Gerd
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 108
  • [2] A conceptual approach to characterizing ecological suitability: Informing socio-ecological measures for restoration effectiveness
    Smith, Lisa M.
    Reschke, Erin M.
    Bousquin, Justin J.
    Harvey, James E.
    Summers, J. Kevin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143
  • [3] A new methodological framework to assess ecological equivalence in compensation schemes
    Borges-Matos, Clarice
    Pequeno, Pedro A. C. L.
    de Siqueira, Marinez Ferreira
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2025, 26
  • [4] A Conceptual Framework for Measuring Ecological Novelty
    Staples, Timothy L.
    Blois, Jessica
    Cramer, Katie L.
    Cunningham, Emer T.
    Dornelas, Maria
    Haberle, Simon G.
    Heger, Tina
    Kiessling, Wolfgang
    Magurran, Anne E.
    O'Dea, Aaron
    Penny, Amelia M.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    Smith, Jansen A.
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Williams, John W.
    Pandolfi, John M.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2025, 34 (02):
  • [5] Ecological compensation in spatial planning in Italy
    Rega, Carlo
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [6] Ecological compensation: How much and where?
    Gastineau, Pascal
    Mossay, Pascal
    Taugourdeau, Emmanuelle
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 190
  • [7] Gains or losses? A quantitative estimation of environmental and economic effects of an ecological compensation policy
    Zhang, Qian
    Hong, Jiayu
    Wu, Feng
    Yang, Yu
    Dong, Congcong
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 31 (05)
  • [8] A conceptual framework for urban ecological restoration and rehabilitation
    Klaus, Valentin H.
    Kiehl, Kathrin
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 52 : 82 - 94
  • [9] Wind Power Compensation is not for the Birds: An Opinion from an Environmental Economist
    Cole, Scott G.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 19 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [10] Some conceptual and methodological elements to approach the environmental multitemporal studies
    Serna Isaza, Ramon Alberto
    PERSPECTIVA GEOGRAFICA, 2005, (11): : 149 - 196