Postoperative imaging follow-up at 2 years as a predictor of long-term outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair

被引:5
作者
Vaaramaki, Suvi [1 ]
Uurto, Ilkka
Suominen, Velipekka
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, Ctr Vasc Surg & Intervent Radiol, POB 2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
关键词
EVAR; Follow-up; Long-term outcome; Surveillance; SAC SHRINKAGE; II ENDOLEAKS; EVAR; REINTERVENTION; COMPLICATIONS; SURVEILLANCE; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.044
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Lifelong imaging follow-up remains the reference standard after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Because the number of EVARs has been increasing, an individually optimized follow-up protocol is desirable. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility of creating such a protocol by evaluating patients' follow-up images and to compare the findings with their freedom from reintervention and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. Methods: From 2000 to 2010, 282 patients with an AAA had undergone elective EVAR with the Zenith stent-graft. The patients were followed up annually until the end of 2019. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence of any endoleak or sac shrinkage at 2 years. Group A included those with no detectable endoleak plus aneurysm sac shrinkage of $5 mm (n = 137; 63%), and group B included those with any type of endoleak and/or no significant aneurysm sac shrinkage (<5 mm; n = 82; 37%). Results: The mean follow-up was 83 months (range, 0-229 months), and the overall survival at 2 years was 84% (n = 237). No significant difference was found in overall survival between groups A and B (P=.73). However, a significant difference was found in freedom from AAA rupture at 12 years, favoring group A (group A, 100%; group B, 91%; P=.002). Furthermore, in group A, the freedom from reintervention was 95% at 12 years compared with only 31% in group B (P <.001). The sensitivity of the categorization was 89% and the specificity was 74% for the finding of a complication requiring a reintervention during long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Patients without an endoleak and a reduction of >= 5 mmin aneurysm size at 2 years had significantly fewer late reinterventions and ruptures during long-term follow-up compared with their counterparts using the Zenith stent-graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). This finding suggests that, for these patients, the follow-up interval can be personalized and safely extended after 2 years.
引用
收藏
页码:1853 / 1860
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients [J].
AbuRahma, Ali F. ;
Campbell, John ;
Stone, Patrick A. ;
Nanjundappa, Aravinda ;
Jain, Akhilesh ;
Dean, L. Scott ;
Habib, Joseph ;
Keiffer, Tammi ;
Emmett, Mary .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) :738-748
[2]   Follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair can be stratified based on first postoperative imaging [J].
Baderkhan, H. ;
Haller, O. ;
Wanhainen, A. ;
Bjorck, M. ;
Mani, K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (06) :709-718
[3]   A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using preoperative variables [J].
Barnes, M. ;
Boult, M. ;
Maddern, G. ;
Fitridge, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 35 (05) :571-579
[4]   The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Dalman, Ronald L. ;
Eskandari, Mark K. ;
Jackson, Benjamin M. ;
Lee, W. Anthony ;
Mansour, M. Ashraf ;
Mastracci, Tara M. ;
Mell, Matthew ;
Murad, M. Hassan ;
Nguyen, Louis L. ;
Oderich, Gustavo S. ;
Patel, Madhukar S. ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
Starnes, Benjamin W. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (01) :2-+
[5]   Effect of Stentgraft Model on Aneurysm Shrinkage in 1,450 Endovascular Aortic Repairs [J].
Cieri, E. ;
De Rango, P. ;
Isernia, G. ;
Simonte, G. ;
Verzini, F. ;
Parlani, G. ;
Ciucci, A. ;
Cao, P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 46 (02) :192-200
[6]   Long-Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [J].
De Bruin, Jorg L. ;
Baas, Annette F. ;
Buth, Jaap ;
Prinssen, Monique ;
Verhoeven, Eric L. G. ;
Cuypers, Philippe W. M. ;
van Sambeek, Marc R. H. M. ;
Balm, Ron ;
Grobbee, Diederick E. ;
Blankensteijn, Jan D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20) :1881-1889
[7]   Incidence, natural course, and outcome of type II endoleaks in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair based on the ENGAGE registry data [J].
Dijkstra, Martijn L. ;
Zeebregts, Clark J. ;
Verhagen, Hence J. M. ;
Teijink, Joep A. W. ;
Power, Adam H. ;
Bockler, Dittmar ;
Peeters, Patrick ;
Riambau, Vicente ;
Becquemin, Jean-Pierre ;
Reijnen, Michel M. P. J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (03) :780-789
[8]   Predictive value of negative initial postoperative imaging after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Gill, Heather L. ;
Ladowski, Stephanie ;
Sudarshan, Monisha ;
Mackenzie, Kent S. ;
Corriveau, Marc M. ;
Abraham, Cherrie Z. ;
Obrand, Daniel I. ;
Steinmetz, Oren K. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (02) :325-329
[9]   Early sac shrinkage predicts a low risk of late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Goncalves, F. Bastos ;
Baderkhan, H. ;
Verhagen, H. J. M. ;
Wanhainen, A. ;
Bjorck, M. ;
Stolker, R. J. ;
Hoeks, S. E. ;
Mani, K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (07) :802-810
[10]   Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Epstein, D ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) :2179-2186