Effects of Maxillary Protraction with Skeletal Anchorage and Petit-Type Facemask in High-Angle Class III Patients: A Retrospective Study

被引:2
|
作者
Kale, Burak [1 ]
Buyukcavus, Muhammed Hilmi [2 ]
机构
[1] Antalya Bilim Univ, Dept Orthodont, Antalya, Turkey
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Orthodont, Isparta, Turkey
关键词
Miniplates; Maxillary retrognathia; Vertical growth pattern; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2020/43419.13587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Skeletal anchorage-supported applications are performed to increase the skeletal effect of maxillary protraction used in the treatment of Class III malocclusions related to maxillary retrognathia. Aim: To assess the craniofacial and soft tissue effects of the maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Petit-type facemask in high-angle growth Class III young adolescent patients due to maxillary retrognathia. Materials and Methods: The archives for this retrospective study were scanned according to inclusion criteria as follows: skeletal Class III malocclusion due to maxillary retrognathia, high-angle growth pattern, treated using face mask with miniplate anchorage. This study consisted of 15 patients (7 females and 8 males; mean age,11.96 1.03 years) treated using Petit-typeface mask with miniplate anchorage inserted in maxillae. Face-mask was used with an approximately 500 g force applied bilaterally from the hooks of the mini plates. Patients used Petit-type face mask for a total of 6 months for the first three months throughout the day, the next 3 months uoRoas&poop kx)11=31 for 12 hours a day. Cephalometric measurements were made to evaluate the effects of the maxillary protraction. The paired t-test was applied to evaluate differences between pre- and posttreatment variables. Results: In our study, the skeletal Class III relationships were improved; maxillary measurements significantly increased (SNA 3.48 0.42; A VRL 3.94 0.81 mm), SNB decreased (-0.50 0.30), ANB increased (3.85 0.46) (p<0.001) and SNGoGn slightly increased (0.25 0.21) (p>0.05). The maxillary and mandibular incisors showed retroclination (-3.12 0.42 p<0.01;-0.46 0.24; respectively). The changes in skeletal and dental parameters caused a significant increase in overjet (3.56 1.01 mm; p<0.001). Conclusion: Using skeletal anchorage with Petit-type facemask has been successfully treated in patients with high-angle Class III young adolescent patients that provided an average increase in maxillary skeletal and soft tissue structures of 3.9 mm and undesired effects of conventional face mask treatment on vertical dimensional measurements were reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Pure skeletal maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage in high-angle Class III patients: A case series
    Kale, Burak
    Buyukcavus, Muhammed Hilmi
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2018, 7 (02) : 66 - 78
  • [2] Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
    Esenlik, Elcin
    Aglarci, Cahide
    Albayrak, Gayem Eroglu
    Findik, Yavuz
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 45 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [3] Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics
    Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray
    Garip, Hasan
    Satilmis, Tulin
    Kucukkeles, Nazan
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [4] Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion
    Lee, Sang-Hoon
    Koh, Sang-Duck
    Chung, Dong-Hwa
    Lee, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Sang-Min
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 42 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [5] Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion
    Liang, Shuran
    Xie, Xianju
    Wang, Fan
    Chang, Qiao
    Wang, Hongmei
    Bai, Yuxing
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 50 (05) : 346 - 355
  • [6] Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients
    Ahn, Hyo-Won
    Kim, Keun-Woo
    Yang, Il-Hyung
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (05) : 935 - 941
  • [7] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction to correct a class III skeletal relationship: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 218 patients
    Van Hevele, Jeroen
    Nout, Erik
    Claeys, Thomas
    Meyns, Joeri
    Scheerlinck, Jan
    Politis, Constantinus
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (10) : 1800 - 1806
  • [8] Effects of Cleft Type, Facemask Anchorage Method, and Alveolar Bone Graft on Maxillary Protraction: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
    Yang, Il-Hyung
    Chang, Young-Il
    Kim, Tae-Woo
    Ahn, Sug-Joon
    Lim, Won-Hee
    Lee, Nam-Ki
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (02) : 221 - 229
  • [9] Is maxillary protraction the earlier the better? A retrospective study on early orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency
    Li, Yibo
    Alifu, Alimire
    Peng, Yiran
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 48 (06) : 133 - 143
  • [10] Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion
    Lee, You-Sun
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Kim, Jaehyun
    Lee, Nam-Ki
    Kim, Yoonji
    Kook, Yoon-Ah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 162 (04) : 520 - 528