Predictors of reading comprehension in deaf and hearing bilinguals

被引:13
作者
Cates, Deborah M. [1 ,2 ]
Traxler, Matthew J. [3 ]
Corina, David P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Cognit Neurolinguist Lab, Ctr Mind & Brain, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Linguist, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
deaf; bilingual; reading; phonological awareness; AMERICAN SIGN-LANGUAGE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SIMPLE VIEW; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; WORKING-MEMORY; VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; INHIBITORY CONTROL; CHILDREN; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1017/S0142716421000412
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigates reading comprehension in adult deaf and hearing readers. Using correlational analysis and stepwise regression, we assess the contribution of English language variables (e.g., vocabulary comprehension, reading volume, and phonological awareness), cognitive variables (e.g., working memory (WM), nonverbal intelligence, and executive function), and language experience (e.g., language acquisition and orthographic experience) in predicting reading comprehension in deaf and hearing adult bilinguals (native American Sign Language (ASL) signers, non-native ASL signers, and Chinese-English bilinguals (CEB)), and monolingual (ML) controls. For all four groups, vocabulary knowledge was a strong contributor to reading comprehension. Monolingual English speakers and non-native deaf signers also showed contributions from WM and spoken language phonological awareness. In contrast, CEB showed contributions of lexical strategies in English reading comprehension. These cross-group comparisons demonstrate how the inclusion of multiple participant groups helps us to further refine our understanding of how language and sensory experiences influence reading comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 123
页数:43
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]   Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? [J].
Adlof, Suzanne M. ;
Catts, Hugh W. ;
Little, Todd D. .
READING AND WRITING, 2006, 19 (09) :933-958
[2]   THE QUALITATIVE SIMILARITY HYPOTHESIS: RESEARCH SYNTHESIS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS [J].
Andrews, Jean F. ;
Wang, Ye .
AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 2015, 159 (05) :468-483
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ, DOI [10.1093/deafed/5.4.337, DOI 10.1093/DEAFED/5.4.337]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, THESIS MCGILL U MONT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, American Annals of the Deaf, DOI DOI 10.1353/AAD.2012.0684
[6]   The paradox of sign language morphology [J].
Aronoff, M ;
Meir, I ;
Sandler, W .
LANGUAGE, 2005, 81 (02) :301-344
[7]   Executive Functioning Skills in Preschool-Age Children With Cochlear Implants [J].
Beer, Jessica ;
Kronenberger, William G. ;
Castellanos, Irina ;
Colson, Bethany G. ;
Henning, Shirley C. ;
Pisoni, David B. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 57 (04) :1521-1534
[8]   What Eye Movements Reveal About Deaf Readers [J].
Belanger, Nathalie N. ;
Rayner, Keith .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 24 (03) :220-226
[9]   Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers [J].
Belanger, Nathalie N. ;
Mayberry, Rachel I. ;
Rayner, Keith .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) :2237-2252
[10]   Skilled Deaf Readers Have an Enhanced Perceptual Span in Reading [J].
Belanger, Nathalie N. ;
Slattery, Timothy J. ;
Mayberry, Rachel I. ;
Rayner, Keith .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (07) :816-823