Environmental regulations, financial constraints and export green-sophistication: Evidence from China's enterprises

被引:43
作者
Ge, Tao [1 ]
Li, Jinye [1 ]
Sha, Ru [1 ]
Hao, XiongLei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 666 Victory Rd, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulations; Financial constraints; Export greensophistication; Effective level; FIRM PRODUCTIVITY EVIDENCE; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CREDIT CONSTRAINTS; EXTENSIVE MARGIN; LEVEL EVIDENCE; CO2; EMISSIONS; INNOVATION; TRADE; GROWTH; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119671
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental governance and financial difficulties are crucial factors affecting the green technology intensity of enterprises' exports. This paper investigates the heterogeneous effects of environmental regulations (ER) and financial constraints (FC) on export greensophistication (EGS) in China. Using an enterprise-level panel dataset for the period 1998-2007, the empirical results show that both ER and FC have positive and negative effects, respectively. However, the positive effect of ER does not fully offset the negative effect of FC, and the net effect of the two causes the actual level to deviate negatively from the effective level. Further grouping tests indicate that the actual level is still below the effective level, but the negative net effect of enterprises is different, among which publicly-held enterprises and mildly-polluting enterprises are the most significant in their respective groups. The EGS does not reach the international level, which is an important reason for China's export to be "large but not strong". According to the change of the net effect, although the improvement of China's EGS is a long-term and arduous, China is expected to become astrong trading country. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   The export technology content, learning by doing and specialization in foreign trade [J].
An, G ;
Iyigun, MF .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 64 (02) :465-483
[2]  
Anand R., 2012, Pediatr. Res., V58, P284
[3]   Foreign direct investment and export quality upgrading in China's manufacturing sector [J].
Anwar, Sajid ;
Sun, Sizhong .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2018, 54 :289-298
[4]   Eco-innovation and regulatory push/pull effect in the case of REACH regulation: empirical evidence based on survey data [J].
Arfaoui, N. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (14) :1536-1554
[5]   Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus [J].
Arminen, Heli ;
Menegaki, Angeliki N. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 :621-634
[6]   A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION BASED ON MAIN PATH ANALYSIS [J].
Barbieri, Nicolo ;
Ghisetti, Claudia ;
Gilli, Marianna ;
Marin, Giovanni ;
Nicolli, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2016, 30 (03) :596-623
[7]   Ownership Structure and Productivity of Multinationals [J].
Bircan, Cagatay .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 116 :125-143
[8]   Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry [J].
Borghesi, Simone ;
Cainelli, Giulio ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :669-683
[9]   Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Zhang, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :339-351
[10]   Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison [J].
Busom, Isabel ;
Andres Velez-Ospina, Jorge .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 99 :75-94