Integrating a bi-objective paradigm to tolerance optimization

被引:14
|
作者
Shin, S.
Cho, B. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Inje Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Gimhae 621749, Kyung Nam, South Korea
关键词
tolerance design; optimal specification limits; weighted-sum method; weighted-tchebycheff method; optimization;
D O I
10.1080/00207540701325181
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The primary goal of tolerance design is to determine the optimal tolerance by minimizing quality loss and process costs (i.e. manufacturing and rejection costs). Most tolerance design models find the optimal tolerance by considering a sum of process quality and costs. In real-world industrial settings, however, quality practitioners often need a balance associated with the quality and costs. For this reason, a bi-objective tolerance optimization problem for obtaining the Pareto solutions of the quality and costs need to be considered. In practical situations, objective functions in many tolerance optimization models reported in the research community often become a high-order, and the associated Pareto frontiers can be non-convex. Thus, it is known that obtaining efficient solutions using the conventional weighted-sum method widely used in tolerance optimization is unlikely. To address this concern, we develop a weighted-Tchebycheff based bi-objective tolerance design model to obtain all efficient solutions and a non-convex Pareto frontier. The weighted-Tchebycheff method is far more effective than any other when a function has higher-order terms or is neither convex nor concave. A numerical example is provided, and a comparison between the two methods is made.
引用
收藏
页码:5509 / 5525
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bi-objective scheduling on two dedicated processors
    Kacem, Adel
    Dammak, Abdelaziz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 13 (05) : 681 - 700
  • [22] Benders decomposition for bi-objective linear programs
    Raith, Andrea
    Lusby, Richard
    Yousefkhan, Ali Akbar Sohrabi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2025, 322 (02) : 376 - 400
  • [23] Bi-objective optimization model and algorithm of rescue routes during major accident time
    Gai, Wen-Mei
    Jiang, Zhong-An
    Deng, Yun-Feng
    Li, Jing
    Du, Yan
    Beijing Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2014, 36 (04): : 535 - 542
  • [24] Pareto Front Generation for Bridge Deck Management System using Bi-Objective Optimization
    Shim, Hyung Seop
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Kang, Bo Soon
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 21 (05) : 1563 - 1572
  • [25] Bi-Objective Optimization Problems-A Game Theory Perspective to Improve Process and Product
    Costa, Nuno
    Lourenco, Joao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [26] Bi-Objective Optimization for Battery Electric Bus Deployment Considering Cost and Environmental Equity
    Zhou, Yirong
    Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy
    Wei, Ran
    Golub, Aaron
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (04) : 2487 - 2497
  • [27] Bi-objective network optimization for spatial and temporal coordination of multiple highway construction projects
    Jun-Seok Oh
    Hyunmyung Kim
    Dongjoo Park
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, 15 : 1449 - 1455
  • [28] RATE: Privacy-Preserving Task Assignment With Bi-Objective Optimization for Mobile Crowdsensing
    Zhao, Bowen
    Guo, Weibin
    Tian, Bo
    Qiao, Cheng
    Pei, Qingqi
    Liu, Ximeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2024, 23 (12) : 13851 - 13865
  • [29] Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation
    Kim, IY
    de Weck, OL
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 29 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [30] Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation
    I.Y. Kim
    O.L. de Weck
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 29 : 149 - 158