Integrating a bi-objective paradigm to tolerance optimization

被引:14
|
作者
Shin, S.
Cho, B. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Inje Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Gimhae 621749, Kyung Nam, South Korea
关键词
tolerance design; optimal specification limits; weighted-sum method; weighted-tchebycheff method; optimization;
D O I
10.1080/00207540701325181
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The primary goal of tolerance design is to determine the optimal tolerance by minimizing quality loss and process costs (i.e. manufacturing and rejection costs). Most tolerance design models find the optimal tolerance by considering a sum of process quality and costs. In real-world industrial settings, however, quality practitioners often need a balance associated with the quality and costs. For this reason, a bi-objective tolerance optimization problem for obtaining the Pareto solutions of the quality and costs need to be considered. In practical situations, objective functions in many tolerance optimization models reported in the research community often become a high-order, and the associated Pareto frontiers can be non-convex. Thus, it is known that obtaining efficient solutions using the conventional weighted-sum method widely used in tolerance optimization is unlikely. To address this concern, we develop a weighted-Tchebycheff based bi-objective tolerance design model to obtain all efficient solutions and a non-convex Pareto frontier. The weighted-Tchebycheff method is far more effective than any other when a function has higher-order terms or is neither convex nor concave. A numerical example is provided, and a comparison between the two methods is made.
引用
收藏
页码:5509 / 5525
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a sequential optimization procedure for robust design and tolerance design within a bi-objective paradigm
    Shin, Sangmun
    Cho, Byung Rae
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 40 (11) : 989 - 1009
  • [2] A Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization
    Wei, Zhifang
    Gao, Weifeng
    Gong, Maoguo
    Yen, Gary G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 28 (01) : 168 - 177
  • [3] Bi-objective optimization of application placement in fog computing environments
    Al-Tarawneh, Mutaz A. B.
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2022, 13 (01) : 445 - 468
  • [4] Metaheuristic Strategies Bi-Objective for the Resolution of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
    Oviedo-Sanchez, Jose L.
    Corena, Jhon
    Camargo, Said
    Romero, Roymer
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL, SIGNALS AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING (ICPCSI), 2017, : 71 - 74
  • [5] Insight into single- and bi-objective optimization of industrial problems
    Gujarathi, Ashish M.
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2023, 38 (15) : 1874 - 1880
  • [6] BI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF TIMETABLING AND VEHICLE SCHEDULING IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
    Weiszer, Michal
    Fedorko, Gabriel
    Molnar, Vieroslav
    CLC 2013: CARPATHIAN LOGISTICS CONGRESS - CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 330 - 335
  • [7] Bi-objective optimization of application placement in fog computing environments
    Mutaz A. B. Al-Tarawneh
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2022, 13 : 445 - 468
  • [8] An Angle-Based Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization
    Yang, Feng
    Wang, Shenwen
    Zhang, Jiaxing
    Gao, Na
    Qu, Jun-Feng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 194015 - 194026
  • [9] Bi-objective Optimization of Site Investigation Program for Liquefaction Hazard Mapping
    Shen, Mengfen
    Chen, Qiushi
    Juang, C. Hsein
    Gong, Wenping
    Tan, Xiaohui
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: ADVANCES IN SOIL DYNAMICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, 2018, : 86 - 93
  • [10] Bi-objective optimization design of heterogeneous injection mold cooling systems
    Huang, JH
    Fadel, GM
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2001, 123 (02) : 226 - 239