Assessment of high and low contrast visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

被引:9
|
作者
Gauthier, CA [1 ]
Holden, BA [1 ]
Epstein, D [1 ]
Tengroth, B [1 ]
Fagerholm, P [1 ]
Hamberg-Nystrom, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Cooperat Res Ctr Eye Res & Technol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
visual acuity; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR); photorefractive keratectomy; refractive surgery;
D O I
10.1097/00006324-199808000-00023
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background. Our aim was to assess visual acuity using standardized charts and illumination conditions after photorefractive keratectomy. Methods. High and low contrast visual acuity were measured on Bailey-Lovie logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) charts under high and low illumination conditions on 105 photorefractive keratectomy patients who had been treated with the Summit (N = 60) dr the VISX (N = 45) excimer laser. Results. Best corrected visual acuity was reduced in the treated eye compared with the untreated control eye under ail test conditions, with the greatest differences under conditions of low contrast and low illumination. Reduction of acuity under low contrast and low illumination was related to small optic zone sizes and steep ablation edge profiles found in Summit-treated eyes. In the VISX-treated eyes, high contrast acuity was reduced in the presence of central topographical irregularities, subepithelial haze, and higher myopic corrections. Conclusions. Testing conditions such as those described here may be useful in quantifying vision degradation in suboptimal viewing conditions and among patients with vague complaints.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 590
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual acuity in the early course following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia
    Nguyen, NX
    Langenbucher, A
    Walter, A
    Küchle, M
    Seitz, B
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 215 (04) : 233 - 236
  • [2] Recovery of uncorrected visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia
    Walker, MB
    Wilson, SE
    CORNEA, 2001, 20 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [3] Reoperations after photorefractive keratectomy for moderate and high myopia
    Pedersen, OO
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 75 (05): : 499 - 502
  • [4] Contrast sensitivity after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia
    Jabbarvand, Mahmoud
    Bakhshi, Javad
    Rajabi, Mohammad Taher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 1 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [5] Visual outcome and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy in low to moderate myopia: Wavefront-optimized versus conventional methods
    Nassiri, Nader
    Safi, Sare
    Amiri, Mohammad Aghazade
    Sheibani, Kourosh
    Safi, Hamid
    Panahi, Nekoo
    Nassiri, Nariman
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (10) : 1858 - 1864
  • [6] Stereoacuity after photorefractive keratectomy in myopia
    Zarei-Ghanavati, Siamak
    Gharaee, Hamid
    Eslampour, Alireza
    Ehsaei, Asieh
    Abrishami, Mojtaba
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 28 (01): : 17 - 20
  • [7] High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity After Artiflex Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for the Correction of Myopia
    van Philips, Lucien A. M.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (06) : 423 - 429
  • [8] Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Olcucu, Onur
    Alagoz, Nese
    Agca, Alper
    Karakucuk, Yalcin
    Demirok, Ahmet
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 627 - 633
  • [9] Four-year visual outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy in pilots with low-moderate myopia
    Moon, Chan Hee
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (02) : 253 - 257
  • [10] Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia
    Yusuf Yildirim
    Onur Olcucu
    Nese Alagoz
    Alper Agca
    Yalcin Karakucuk
    Ahmet Demirok
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 627 - 633