Outcomes following surgical management of vagus nerve stimulator-related infection: a retrospective multi-institutional study

被引:5
作者
Hasegawa, Hirotaka [1 ,3 ]
Van Gompel, Jamie J. [1 ]
Marsh, W. Richard [1 ]
Wharen Jr, Robert E. [4 ]
Zimmerman, Richard S. [5 ]
Burkholder, David B. [2 ]
Lundstrom, Brian N. [2 ]
Britton, Jeffrey W. [2 ]
Meyer, Fredric B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Tokyo Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
epilepsy; hardware infection; surgical complication; vagus nerve stimulator; TREATMENT-RESISTANT EPILEPSY; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; LONG-TERM; INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE; REFRACTORY EPILEPSY; COMPLICATIONS; CHILDREN; REMOVAL; IMPLANTATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.3171/2020.7.JNS201385
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Surgical site infection (SSI) is a rare but significant complication after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) placement. Treatment options range from antibiotic therapy alone to hardware removal. The optimal therapeutic strategy remains open to debate. Therefore, the authors conducted this retrospective multicenter analysis to provide insight into the optimal management of VNS-related SSI (VNS-SSI). METHODS Under institutional review board approval and utilizing an institutional database with 641 patients who had undergone 808 VNS-related placement surgeries and 31 patients who had undergone VNS-related hardware removal surgeries, the authors retrospectively analyzed VNS-SSI. RESULTS Sixteen cases of VNS-SSI were identified; 12 of them had undergone the original VNS placement procedure at the authors' institutions. Thus, the incidence of VNS-SSI was calculated as 1.5%. The mean (+/- standard deviation) time from the most recent VNS-related surgeries to infection was 42 (+/- 27) days. Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus was the usual causative bacteria (58%). Initial treatments included antibiotics with or without nonsurgical procedures (n = 6), nonremoval open surgeries for irrigation (n = 3), generator removal (n = 3), and total or near-total removal of hardware (n = 4). Although 2 patients were successfully treated with antibiotics alone or combined with generator removal, removal of both the generator and leads was eventually required in 14 patients. Mild swallowing difficulties and hoarseness occurred in 2 patients with eventual resolution. CONCLUSIONS Removal of the VNS including electrode leads combined with antibiotic administration is the definitive treatment but has a risk of causing dysphagia. If the surgeon finds dense scarring around the vagus nerve, the prudent approach is to snip the electrode close to the nerve as opposed to attempting to unwind the lead completely.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 791
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Vagus nerve stimulation lead removal or replacement: surgical technique, institutional experience, and literature overview [J].
Aalbers, Marlien W. ;
Rijkers, Kim ;
Klinkenberg, Sylvia ;
Majoie, Marian ;
Cornips, Erwin M. J. .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (11) :1917-1924
[2]   Management of vagal nerve stimulator infections: do they need to be removed? Clinical article [J].
Air, Ellen L. ;
Ghomri, Yashar M. ;
Tyagi, Rachana ;
Grande, Andrew W. ;
Crone, Kerry ;
Mangano, Francesco T. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2009, 3 (01) :73-78
[3]   An institutional experience with cervical vagus nerve trunk stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: Rationale, technique, and outcome [J].
Amar, AP ;
Heck, CN ;
Levy, ML ;
Smith, T ;
DeGiorgio, CM ;
Oviedo, S ;
Apuzzo, MLJ .
NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 43 (06) :1265-1276
[4]   Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety [J].
Ben-Menachem, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 18 (05) :415-418
[5]   Vagal nerve stimulation for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy: a review of the current literature [J].
Connor, David E., Jr. ;
Nixon, Menarvia ;
Nanda, Anil ;
Guthikonda, Bharat .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 32 (03)
[6]   The Mechanism of Action of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression Current Conceptualizations [J].
Conway, Charles R. ;
Xiong, Willa .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 41 (03) :395-+
[7]   Brain blood-flow change with acute vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-refractory major depressive disorder [J].
Conway, Charles R. ;
Sheline, Yvette I. ;
Chibnall, John T. ;
Bucholz, Richard D. ;
Price, Joseph L. ;
Gangwani, Sunil ;
Mintun, Mark A. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (02) :163-171
[8]   Cerebral blood flow changes during vagus nerve stimulation for depression [J].
Conway, CR ;
Sheline, YI ;
Chibnall, JT ;
George, MS ;
Fletcher, JW ;
Mintun, MA .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2006, 146 (02) :179-184
[9]   Long-term Expectations of Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Look at Battery Replacement and Revision Surgery [J].
Couch, Jonathan D. ;
Gilman, Arthur M. ;
Doyle, Werner K. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (01) :42-46
[10]   Prospective long-term study of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory seizures [J].
DeGiorgio, CM ;
Schachter, SC ;
Handforth, A ;
Salinsky, M ;
Thompson, J ;
Uthman, B ;
Reed, R ;
Collins, S ;
Tecoma, E ;
Morris, GL ;
Vaughn, B ;
Naritoku, DK ;
Henry, T ;
Labar, D ;
Gilmartin, R ;
Labiner, D ;
Osorio, I ;
Ristanovic, R ;
Jones, J ;
Murphy, J ;
Ney, G ;
Wheless, J ;
Lewis, P ;
Heck, C .
EPILEPSIA, 2000, 41 (09) :1195-1200