Correct detection of measurement bias could help researchers revise models or refine psychological scales. Measurement bias detection can be viewed as a variable-selection problem, in which biased items are optimally selected from a set of items. This study investigated a number of regularization methods: ridge, lasso, elastic net (enet) and adaptive lasso (alasso), in comparison with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for detecting various forms of measurement bias in regard to a continuous violator using restricted factor analysis. Particularly, complex structural equation models with relatively small sample sizes were the study focus. Through a simulation study and an empirical example, results indicated that the enet outperformed other methods in small samples for identifying biased items. The alasso yielded low false positive rates for non-biased items outside of a high number of biased items. MLE performed well for the overall estimation of biased items.