How to overcome barriers limiting LCA adoption? The role of a collaborative and multi-stakeholder approach

被引:11
|
作者
Testa, Francesco [1 ]
Tessitore, Sara [1 ]
Buttol, Patrizia [2 ]
Iraldo, Fabio [1 ]
Cortesi, Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Management, Piazza Martiri Liberta 33, Pisa, Italy
[2] ENEA Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Susta, Lab Valorisat Resources Prod & Terr Syst SSPT USE, Martiri di Monte Sole 4, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
关键词
PEF; SMEs; Collaborative approach; Stakeholders; LCM; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; DEFINITION; THINKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02070-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Companies meet hindrances and difficulties in adopting life cycle assessment (LCA) as a way to identify and assess the environmental aspects of their products and services. Collaborative approaches that are able to involve companies, researchers, trade associations, and other stakeholders can support the organizations in overcoming the LCA barriers by developing common resources. So, the research goal is to demonstrate how the developed collaborative approach enhances the adoption of LCA and product environmental footprint (PEF) in small and medium organizations. The paper presents the results achieved by 15 organizations, operating within five different supply chains, where the collaborative approach was tested. Method The research method we followed in our research is the "action research," focused on the so called "engaged scholarship." Action research is based on a strong cooperation between researchers and practitioners belonging to the organizations involved. It relies on extensive interaction in order to solve a specific problem and generate new knowledge. Results and discussion A cooperative approach was designed and proposed to five supply chains (foundry, furniture, two food chains, and catering services) and in particular to 15 Italian companies that adopted LCA and PEF to improve their environmental performance. Each supply chain tested and internalized the proposed collaborative approach: In partnership with trade associations and researchers, companies participated in training initiatives, contributed to the development of PEF Category Rules, measured the environmental footprint of their products, and adopted improvement actions. Thanks to the action-research experience, all the involved companies achieved environmental improvements such as energy saving and emissions reduction, which demonstrates how the collaborative approach to LCA is effective in terms of footprint reduction. Conclusion The research shows how the proposed collaborative approach can be effective for overcoming the lack of resources and knowledge in LCA adoption. The five supply chains, and 15 organizations involved, had the chance of experimenting "in field" how the LCA can improve both their competitiveness and their environmental performance. The research findings also contribute to the stakeholder engagement theory.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 958
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Collaborative Approach to Sustainability: A Model of Commissioning System Intervention in Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships from National to Global Levels
    Dragomir, Camelia-Cristina
    Foris, Tiberiu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [22] Multi-stakeholder Approach for Designing an AI Model to Predict Treatment Adherence
    Merino-Barbancho, Beatriz
    Arroyo, Pena
    Rujas, Miguel
    Cipric, Ana
    Ciccone, Nicholas
    Lupianez-Villanueva, Francisco
    Roca-Umbert Wurth, Ana
    Folkvord, Frans
    Fernanda Cabrera, Maria
    Teresa Arredondo, Maria
    Fico, Giuseppe
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, DHM 2023, PT II, 2023, 14029 : 260 - 271
  • [23] How to Strengthen Innovation Support Services in Agriculture with Regard to Multi-Stakeholder Approaches
    Faure, Guy
    Knierim, Andrea
    Koutsouris, Alex
    Ndah, Hycenth Tim
    Audouin, Sarah
    Zarokosta, Elena
    Wielinga, Eelke
    Triomphe, Bernard
    Mathe, Syndhia
    Temple, Ludovic
    Heanue, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2019, (28): : 145 - 169
  • [24] How off-season tourism promotion affects seasonal destinations? A multi-stakeholder perspective in Tibet
    Sang Senyao
    He Wei
    Ni Ma
    TOURISM REVIEW, 2021, 76 (01) : 229 - 240
  • [25] Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Yung-Chi Shen
    Quality & Quantity, 2017, 51 : 2865 - 2884
  • [26] Sustainable business model innovation: The role of boundary work for multi-stakeholder alignment
    Velter, M. G. E.
    Bitzer, V.
    Bocken, N. M. P.
    Kemp, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [27] Smart, sustainable, and circular port maintenance: A comprehensive framework and multi-stakeholder approach
    Sepehri, Arash
    Kirichek, Alex
    van den Heuvel, Marcel
    van Koningsveld, Mark
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [28] Adaptive governance and resilience: the role of multi-stakeholder platforms in disaster risk reduction
    Djalante, R.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (09) : 2923 - 2942
  • [29] A multi-stakeholder perception analysis about the adoption, impacts and priority areas in the Kenyan clean cooking sector
    Alice Karanja
    Francis Mburu
    Alexandros Gasparatos
    Sustainability Science, 2020, 15 : 333 - 351
  • [30] A multi-stakeholder perception analysis about the adoption, impacts and priority areas in the Kenyan clean cooking sector
    Karanja, Alice
    Mburu, Francis
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01) : 333 - 351