Quality of life after parotid-sparing IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: A prospective longitudinal study

被引:260
|
作者
Lin, A
Kim, HM
Terrell, JE
Dawson, LA
Ship, JA
Eisbruch, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan Hosp, Ctr Stat Consultat & Res, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
head-and-neck cancer; quality of life; xerostomia; IMRT; intensity-modulated radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00361-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer reduces xerostomia compared with standard RT. To assess potential improvements in broader aspects of quality of life (QOL), we initiated a study of patient-reported QOL and its predictors after IMRT. Methods and Materials: This was a prospective longitudinal study of head-and-neck cancer patients receiving multisegmental static IMRT. Patients were given a validated xerostomia questionnaire (XQ), and a validated head-and-neck cancer-related QOL questionnaire consisting of four multi-item domains: Eating, Communication, Pain, and Emotion. The Eating domain contains one question (total of six) asking directly about xerostomia. In both questionnaires, higher scores denote worse symptoms or QOL. The questionnaires and measurements of salivary output from the major glands were completed before RT started (pre-RT) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. The association between the QOL scores and patient-, tumor-, and therapy-related factors was assessed using the random effects model. Results: Thirty-six patients participating in the study completed the questionnaires through 12 months. The XQ scores worsened significantly at 3 months compared with the pre-RT scores, but later they improved gradually through 12 months (p = 0.003), in parallel with an increase in the salivary output from the spared salivary glands. The QOL summary scores were stable between the baseline (pre-RT) and 3 months after RT scores. Patients receiving postoperative RT (whose pre-RT questionnaires were taken a few weeks after surgery) tended to have improved scores after RT, reflecting the subsidence of acute postoperative sequelae, compared with a tendency toward worsened scores in patients receiving definitive RT. After 3 months, statistically significant improvement was noted in the summary QOL scores for all patients, through 12 months after RT (p = 0.01). The salivary flow rates, tumor doses, mean oral cavity dose, age, gender, sites or stages of tumor, surgery, and use of chemotherapy were not associated with the QOL scores at any point. The mean dose to the parotid glands correlated with the QOL scores at 3 months (p = 0.05) but not at other post-RT periods. The XQ and QOL summary scores did not correlate before RT but were significantly correlated at each post-RT point (p < 0.01), with a linear correlation coefficient (r) of 0.59, 0.72, and 0.67 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At these points, the XQ scores also correlated significantly with the scores of each of the individual QOL domains (p :5 0.01), including the domains Pain and Emotion, which did not contain any xerostomia-related question. Conclusion: After parotid-sparing IMRT, a statistically significant correlation was noted between patient-reported xerostomia and each of the domains of QOL: Eating, Communication, Pain, and Emotion. Both xerostomia and QOL scores improved significantly over time during the first year after therapy. These results suggest that the efforts to improve xerostomia using IMRT may yield improvements in broad aspects of QOL. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Volumetric changes of the parotid gland during IMRT based on mid-treatment imaging: implications for parotid stem cell sparing strategies in head and neck cancer
    Gjini, Megi
    Ahmed, Sadia
    Kalnicki, Shalom
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Garg, Madhur K.
    Kabarriti, Rafi
    Brodin, N. Patrik
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2022, 61 (09) : 1069 - 1074
  • [22] Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer
    Nguyen, NP
    Frank, C
    Moltz, CC
    Vos, P
    Smith, HJ
    Karlsson, U
    Dutta, S
    Midyett, A
    Barloon, J
    Sallah, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03): : 772 - 778
  • [23] Longitudinal assessment of parotid function in patients receiving tomotherapy for head-and-neck cancer
    Voordeckers, Mia
    Everaert, Hendrik
    Tournel, Koen
    Verellen, Dirk
    Baron, Ilan
    Van Esch, Gretel
    Vanhove, Chris
    Storme, Guy
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 184 (08) : 400 - 405
  • [24] Patient-reported outcomes following parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. How important is dysphagia?
    Roe, Justin W. G.
    Drinnan, Michael J.
    Carding, Paul N.
    Harrington, Kevin J.
    Nutting, Christopher M.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 50 (12) : 1182 - 1187
  • [25] Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients - A prospective longitudinal study (FEMH 110183-E)
    Chuang, Yu-Hsuan
    Liao, Li-Jen
    Shueng, Pei-Wei
    Hsu, Chen-Xiong
    Kuo, Deng-Yu
    Hou, Pei-Yu
    Lu, Yueh-Feng
    Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S1299 - S1302
  • [26] Quality of life in Iranian patients with head-and-neck cancer
    Hashemipour, Maryam Alsadat
    Pooyafard, Adeleh
    Navabi, Nader
    Kakoie, Shahla
    Rahbanian, Nazanin
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [27] Prospective, longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with cancer of the head and neck and their primary carers
    Terro, W.
    Crean, St. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (06) : 613 - 617
  • [28] Only sociodemographic variables predict quality of life after radiotherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer
    Sehlen, S
    Hollenhorst, H
    Lenk, M
    Schymura, B
    Herschbach, P
    Aydemir, U
    Dühmke, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (03): : 779 - 783
  • [29] Prospective longitudinal assessment of parotid gland function using dynamic quantitative pertechnate scintigraphy and estimation of dose–response relationship of parotid-sparing radiotherapy in head-neck cancers
    Tejpal Gupta
    Chandni Hotwani
    Sadhana Kannan
    Zubin Master
    Venkatesh Rangarajan
    Vedang Murthy
    Ashwini Budrukkar
    Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar
    Jai Prakash Agarwal
    Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [30] Postradiotherapy quality of life for head-and-neck cancer patients is independent of xerostomia
    Ringash, J
    Warde, P
    Lockwood, G
    O'Sullivan, B
    Waldron, J
    Cummings, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05): : 1403 - 1407