Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: Part I. Alcohol use and related consequences

被引:93
作者
Clifford, Patrick R.
Maisto, Stephen A.
Davis, Christine M.
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Hlth & Behav, Syracuse, NY USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Sch Publ Hlth, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.15288/jsad.2007.68.519
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: There has been increasing recognition among alcohol treatment researchers that research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects can contribute to clinical outcomes, decrease study design sensitivity, and confound research findings. The present study is an experimental investigation of two of the more salient components of the research assessment interview (i.e., frequency and comprehensiveness) and their effects on clinical outcomes (Part I: Alcohol Use and Related Consequences) and treatment participation (Part 11: Treatment Engagement and Involvement). Method: The study design was a 2 (Frequency of Assessment) x 2 (Comprehensiveness of Assessment) completely randomized factorial, and study participants were randomly assigned, using an urn randomization procedure, to one of the resulting four experimental research assessment exposure conditions: (1) frequent-comprehensive, (2) frequent-brief, (3) infrequent-comprehensive, and (4) infrequent-brief. Study participants were recruited from one of two hos- pital-based outpatient alcohol- and other substance-abuse clinics. Two hundred thirty-five subjects were randomly assigned to one of the four research assessment exposure conditions. Results: Research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects were related significantly to alcohol use and related negative consequences, such that subjects assigned to the infrequent-brief research assessment exposure condition reported the poorest outcomes. Conclusions: The research protocols used to study alcohol treatments have clinical efficacy and can alter the outcomes (e.g., alcohol use) under investigation. It is important for researchers to control/account for subject reactivity effects when conducting alcohol treatment outcome trials. Accurate interpretation of data derived from clinical trials of alcohol treatments necessitates taking research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects into consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 528
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Addiction, V92, P1671
[2]  
[Anonymous], J BEHAV ASSESS, DOI 10.1007/BF01321373
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Issues in Alcohol Use and Misuse by Young Adults
[4]  
ANTON RF, 2005, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V295, P2003
[5]   BRIEF INTERVENTIONS FOR ALCOHOL-PROBLEMS - A REVIEW [J].
BIEN, TH ;
MILLER, WR ;
TONIGAN, JS .
ADDICTION, 1993, 88 (03) :315-336
[6]   Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews and drinking behaviors [J].
Clifford, PR ;
Maisto, SA ;
Franzke, LH ;
Longabaugh, R ;
Beattie, MC .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2000, 61 (05) :736-743
[7]   Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research [J].
Clifford, PR ;
Maisto, SA .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2000, 61 (06) :787-793
[8]   Is alcohol assessment therapeutic? Pretreatment change in drinking among alcohol-dependent women [J].
Epstein, EE ;
Drapkin, ML ;
Yusko, DA ;
Cook, SM ;
McCrady, BS ;
Jensen, NK .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2005, 66 (03) :369-378
[9]  
Feragne M A, 1983, Eval Health Prof, V6, P25, DOI 10.1177/016327878300600102
[10]   TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF FOLLOW-UP RESEARCH WITH ALCOHOLICS [J].
GALLEN, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1974, 34 (03) :877-878