Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution Compared With Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:12
作者
Ho, Ming
Cheng, Shi-Yann [1 ]
Li, Tsai-Chung
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Beigang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beigang 651, Yun Lin, Taiwan
关键词
CESAREAN-SECTION; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; RISK-FACTORS; INDUCTION; MANAGEMENT; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ed36cc
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare titrated oral misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor augmentation among women at 36 to 42 weeks of gestation with spontaneous onset of active labor. METHODS: Women meeting the general selection criteria with regular contractions and an effaced cervix dilated between 3 and 9 cm, and who had inadequate uterine contractions (two or fewer contractions every 10 minutes) during the first stage of labor, were randomly assigned to titrated oral misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin. Augmentation-to-vaginal delivery interval and vaginal delivery within 12 or 24 hours were the primary outcomes. The data were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Of the 231 women, 118 (51.1%) were randomized to titrated oral misoprostol and 113 (48.9%) to titrated intravenous oxytocin. The median interval from the start of augmentation to vaginal delivery was 5.22 hours (3.77-8.58 hours, 25th-75th percentile) in the misoprostol group, and 5.20 hours (3.23-6.50 hours, 25th-75th percentile) in the intravenous oxytocin group (P=.019). Complete vaginal delivery occurred within 12 hours for 92 women (78.0%) in the misoprostol group and for 97 women (85.8%) in the oxytocin group (P=.121; relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups who delivered vaginally within 24 hours. Side effects and neonatal outcomes also did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Labor augmentation with titrated oral misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin resulted in similar rates of vaginal delivery within 12 and 24 hours.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 618
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Oral misoprostol for induction of labour [J].
Alfirevic, Z. ;
Weeks, A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Obstet Gynecol, V101, P1049
[3]   A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction [J].
Bennett, KA ;
Butt, K ;
Crane, JMG ;
Hutchens, D ;
Young, DC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :481-486
[4]   Rates of caesarean section:: analysis of global, regional and national estimates [J].
Betran, Ana P. ;
Merialdi, Mario ;
Lauer, Jeremy A. ;
Bing-Shun, Wang ;
Thomas, Jane ;
Van Look, Paul ;
Wagner, Marsden .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :98-113
[5]   Outcomes of labours augmented with oxytocin [J].
Bugg, GJ ;
Stanley, E ;
Baker, PN ;
Taggart, MJ ;
Johnston, TA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 124 (01) :37-41
[6]  
Cheng Shi-Yann, 2006, Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, V45, P225
[7]   Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Cheng, Shi-Yann ;
Ming, Ho ;
Lee, Jui-Chi .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) :119-125
[8]   Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital [J].
Florica, M ;
Stephansson, O ;
Nordström, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) :181-185
[9]  
Hofmeyr G J., 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000941, 10.1002/14651858.CD000941]
[10]   Misoprostol for induction of labour:: a systematic review [J].
Hofmeyr, GJ ;
Gülmezoglu, AM ;
Alfirevic, Z .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (08) :798-803