Using Supervised Learning Methods for Gene Selection in RNA-Seq Case-Control Studies

被引:33
作者
Wenric, Stephane [1 ,2 ]
Shemirani, Ruhollah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, GIGA Res, Lab Human Genet, Liege, Belgium
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Charles Bronfman Inst Personalized Med, Dept Genet & Genom Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Informat Sci Inst, Dept Comp Sci, Marina Del Rey, CA USA
关键词
RNA-Seq; supervised learning; random forests; variational autoencoders; gene selection; feature selection; transcriptomics; gene expression; CANCER; EXPRESSION; EVOLUTION; RECEPTOR; GROWTH; IGF-1; TOOL;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2018.00297
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Whole transcriptome studies typically yield large amounts of data, with expression values for all genes or transcripts of the genome. The search for genes of interest in a particular study setting can thus be a daunting task, usually relying on automated computational methods Moreover, most biological questions imply that such a search should be performed in a multivariate setting, to take into account the inter-genes relationships. Differential expression analysis commonly yields large lists of genes deemed significant, even after adjustment for multiple testing, making the subsequent study possibilities extensive. Here, we explore the use of supervised learning methods to rank large ensembles of genes defined by their expression values measured with RNA-Seq in a typical 2 classes sample set. First, we use one of the variable importance measures generated by the random forests classification algorithm as a metric to rank genes Second, we define the EPS (extreme pseudo-samples) pipeline, making use of VAEs (Variational Autoencoders) and regressors to extract a ranking of genes while leveraging the feature space of both virtual and comparable samples We show that, on 12 cancer RNA-Seq data sets ranging from 323 to 1,210 samples, using either a random forests-based gene selection method or the EPS pipeline outperforms differential expression analysis for 9 and 8 out of the 12 datasets respectively, in terms of identifying subsets of genes associated with survival These results demonstrate the potential of supervised learning-based gene selection methods in RNA-Seq studies and highlight the need to use such multivariate gene selection methods alongside the widely used differential expression analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Gene Selection Methods for Clustering Single-cell RNA-seq Data
    Zhu, Xiaoshu
    Wang, Jianxin
    Li, Rongruan
    Peng, Xiaoqing
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 18 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data
    Sultan, Marc
    Amstislavskiy, Vyacheslav
    Risch, Thomas
    Schuette, Moritz
    Doekel, Simon
    Ralser, Meryem
    Balzereit, Daniela
    Lehrach, Hans
    Yaspo, Marie-Laure
    BMC GENOMICS, 2014, 15
  • [3] Comparative studies of differential gene calling using RNA-Seq data
    Zheng, Ximeng
    Moriyama, Etsuko N.
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14
  • [4] Gene Ontology based housekeeping gene selection for RNA-seq normalization
    Chen, Chien-Ming
    Lu, Yu-Lun
    Sio, Chi-Pong
    Wu, Guan-Chung
    Tzou, Wen-Shyong
    Pai, Tun-Wen
    METHODS, 2014, 67 (03) : 354 - 363
  • [5] Gene selection using hybrid dragonfly black hole algorithm: A case study on RNA-seq COVID-19 data
    Pashaei, Elnaz
    Pashaei, Elham
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 627
  • [6] Effective methods for bulk RNA-seq deconvolution using scnRNA-seq transcriptomes
    Cobos, Francisco Avila
    Panah, Mohammad Javad Najaf
    Epps, Jessica
    Long, Xiaochen
    Man, Tsz-Kwong
    Chiu, Hua-Sheng
    Chomsky, Elad
    Kiner, Evgeny
    Krueger, Michael J.
    di Bernardo, Diego
    Voloch, Luis
    Molenaar, Jan
    van Hooff, Sander R.
    Westermann, Frank
    Jansky, Selina
    Redell, Michele L.
    Mestdagh, Pieter
    Sumazin, Pavel
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [7] Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias
    Young, Matthew D.
    Wakefield, Matthew J.
    Smyth, Gordon K.
    Oshlack, Alicia
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2010, 11 (02):
  • [8] Analyzing RNA-Seq Gene Expression Data Using Deep Learning Approaches for Cancer Classification
    Rukhsar, Laiqa
    Bangyal, Waqas Haider
    Ali Khan, Muhammad Sadiq
    Ag Ibrahim, Ag Asri
    Nisar, Kashif
    Rawat, Danda B.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [9] Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data
    Marc Sultan
    Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy
    Thomas Risch
    Moritz Schuette
    Simon Dökel
    Meryem Ralser
    Daniela Balzereit
    Hans Lehrach
    Marie-Laure Yaspo
    BMC Genomics, 15
  • [10] Evaluation of Normalization Methods for RNA-Seq Gene Expression Estimation
    Wu, Po-Yen
    Phan, John H.
    Zhou, Fengfeng
    Wang, May D.
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE WORKSHOPS, 2011, : 50 - 57