High Grazing Rates on Cryptophyte Algae in Chesapeake Bay

被引:18
作者
Johnson, Matthew D. [1 ]
Beaudoin, David J. [1 ]
Frada, Miguel J. [2 ]
Brownlee, Emily F. [3 ]
Stoecker, Diane K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Interuniv Inst Marine Sci Eilat, Alexander Silberman Inst Life Sci, Elat, Israel
[3] Univ Maryland, Horn Point Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Cambridge, MD USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cryptophytes; mixotrophy; grazing; Chesapeake Bay; dinoflagellates; Mesodinium rubrum; MESODINIUM-RUBRUM; PHYTOPLANKTON COMPOSITION; GYRODINIUM-GALATHEANUM; MYRIONECTA-RUBRA; LABOEA-STROBILA; RIVER ESTUARY; RED TIDES; GROWTH; MICROZOOPLANKTON; CILIATE;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2018.00241
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cryptophyte algae are globally distributed photosynthetic flagellates found in freshwater, estuarine, and neritic ecosystems. While cryptophytes can be highly abundant and are consumed by a wide variety of protistan predators, few studies have sought to quantify in situ grazing rates on their populations. Here we show that autumnal grazing rates on in situ communities of cryptophyte algae in Chesapeake Bay are high throughout the system, while growth rates, particularly in the lower bay, were low. Analysis of the genetic diversity of cryptophyte populations within dilution experiments suggests that microzooplankton may be selectively grazing the fastest-growing members of the population, which were generally Teleaulax spp. We also demonstrate that potential grazing rates of ciliates and dinoflagellates on fluorescently labeled (FL) Rhodomonas saline, Storeatula major, and Teleaulax amphioxeia can be high (up to 149 prey predator(-1) d(-1)), and that a Gyrodinium sp. and Mesodinium rubrum could be selective grazers. Potential grazing was highest for heterotrophic dinoflagellates, but due to its abundance, M. rubrum also had a high overall impact. This study reveals that cryptophyte algae in Chesapeake Bay can experience extremely high grazing pressure from phagotrophic protists, and that this grazing likely shapes their community diversity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Nutrient Management and the Chesapeake Bay [J].
Beegle, Douglas .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2013, 151 (01) :3-8
[22]   Marine Heatwaves in the Chesapeake Bay [J].
Mazzini, Piero L. F. ;
Pianca, Cassia .
FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 8
[23]   Grazing by mesozooplankton and microzooplankton on toxic and non-toxic strains of Microcystis in the Transquaking River, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay [J].
Davis, Timothy W. ;
Gobler, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 2011, 33 (03) :415-430
[24]   A test of the gleaner-opportunist trade-off among photosynthetic traits in cryptophyte algae [J].
Swanson, Jake A. ;
Greenwold, Matthew J. ;
Richardson, Tammi L. ;
Dudycha, Jeffry L. .
ECOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (07)
[25]   The Importance of Winter Dinoflagellate Blooms in Chesapeake Bay-a Missing Link in Bay Productivity [J].
Millette, Nicole C. ;
Clayton, Sophie ;
Mulholland, Margaret R. ;
Gibala-Smith, Leah ;
Lane, Michael .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2023, 46 (04) :986-997
[26]   OSPREY DIET COMPOSITION AND QUALITY IN HIGH- AND LOW-SALINITY AREAS OF LOWER CHESAPEAKE BAY [J].
Glass, K. Andrew ;
Watts, Bryan D. .
JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (01) :27-36
[27]   Sediment Accumulation Rates and Submersed Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Distributions in the Mesohaline Chesapeake Bay, USA [J].
Cindy M. Palinkas ;
Evamaria W. Koch .
Estuaries and Coasts, 2012, 35 :1416-1431
[28]   RESOURCE PROTECTION FOR WATERBIRDS IN CHESAPEAKE BAY [J].
ERWIN, RM ;
HARAMIS, GM ;
KREMENTZ, DG ;
FUNDERBURK, SL .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1993, 17 (05) :613-619
[29]   Promising Biomolecules with High Antioxidant Capacity Derived from Cryptophyte Algae Grown under Different Light Conditions [J].
Abidizadegan, Maryam ;
Blomster, Jaanika ;
Fewer, David ;
Peltomaa, Elina .
BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (08)
[30]   GUILDS OF CILIATE MICROZOOPLANKTON IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY [J].
DOLAN, JR .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 1991, 33 (02) :137-152