Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Proton Therapy, or Conformal Radiation Therapy and Morbidity and Disease Control in Localized Prostate Cancer

被引:351
作者
Sheets, Nathan C. [1 ]
Goldin, Gregg H. [1 ]
Meyer, Anne-Marie [2 ,4 ]
Wu, Yang [4 ]
Chang, YunKyung [5 ]
Stuermer, Til [6 ]
Holmes, Jordan A. [1 ,3 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [4 ,7 ]
Godley, Paul A. [2 ,4 ]
Carpenter, William R. [2 ,4 ,7 ]
Chen, Ronald C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2012年 / 307卷 / 15期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SEER-MEDICARE DATA; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DOSE-ESCALATION; 70; GY; RADIOTHERAPY; URINARY; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2012.460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context There has been rapid adoption of newer radiation treatments such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy despite greater cost and limited demonstrated benefit compared with previous technologies. Objective To determine the comparative morbidity and disease control of IMRT, proton therapy, and conformal radiation therapy for primary prostate cancer treatment. Design, Setting, and Patients Population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked data from 2000 through 2009 for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Main Outcome Measures Rates of gastrointestinal and urinary morbidity, erectile dysfunction, hip fractures, and additional cancer therapy. Results Use of IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy increased from 0.15% in 2000 to 95.9% in 2008. In propensity score-adjusted analyses (N=12 976), men who received IMRT vs conformal radiation therapy were less likely to receive a diagnosis of gastrointestinal morbidities (absolute risk, 13.4 vs 14.7 per 100 person-years; relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96) and hip fractures (absolute risk, 0.8 vs 1.0 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93) but more likely to receive a diagnosis of erectile dysfunction (absolute risk, 5.9 vs 5.3 per 100 person-years; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients were less likely to receive additional cancer therapy (absolute risk, 2.5 vs 3.1 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89). In a propensity score-matched comparison between IMRT and proton therapy (n=1368), IMRT patients had a lower rate of gastrointestinal morbidity (absolute risk, 12.2 vs 17.8 per 100 person-years; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.79). There were no significant differences in rates of other morbidities or additional therapies between IMRT and proton therapy. Conclusions Among patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, the use of IMRT compared with conformal radiation therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity and fewer hip fractures but more erectile dysfunction; IMRT compared with proton therapy was associated with less gastrointestinal morbidity. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1611-1620
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1620
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] RADIATION DOSE-VOLUME EFFECTS IN RADIATION-INDUCED RECTAL INJURY
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Gay, Hiram
    Jackson, Andrew
    Tucker, Susan L.
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : S123 - S129
  • [22] Can megavoltage computed tomography reduce proton range uncertainties in treatment plans for patients with large metal implants?
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    Giebeler, Annelise
    Langen, Katja M.
    Mirkovic, Dragan
    Mohan, Radhe
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (09) : 2327 - 2344
  • [23] Cost Implications of the Rapid Adoption of Newer Technologies for Treating Prostate Cancer
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Lei, Yin
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (12) : 1517 - 1524
  • [24] Reduction of small and large bowel irradiation using an optimized intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy technique in patients with prostate cancer
    Nutting, CM
    Convery, DJ
    Cosgrove, VP
    Rowbottom, C
    Padhani, AR
    Webb, S
    Dearnaley, DP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (03): : 649 - 656
  • [25] Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer
    Pollack, A
    Zagars, GK
    Smith, LG
    Lee, JJ
    von Eschenbach, AC
    Antolak, JA
    Starkschall, G
    Rosen, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (23) : 3904 - 3911
  • [26] Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial
    Pollack, A
    Zagars, GK
    Starkschall, G
    Antolak, JA
    Lee, JJ
    Huang, E
    von Eschenbach, AC
    Kuban, DA
    Rosen, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1097 - 1105
  • [27] PONTES JE, 1993, CANCER, V71, P976, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<976::AID-CNCR2820711413>3.0.CO
  • [28] 2-M
  • [29] Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: The prostate cancer outcomes study
    Potosky, AL
    Davis, WW
    Hoffman, RM
    Stanford, JL
    Stephenson, RA
    Penson, DF
    Harlan, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (18) : 1358 - 1367
  • [30] Potosky AL, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P62