On Gravity, Specialization and Intra-industry Trade

被引:5
作者
Song, E. Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Dept Econ, Seoul 121742, South Korea
关键词
EQUATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00961.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Contrary to the popular belief, specialization is not necessary for gravity equations. This paper shows that the simple gravity equation holds if and only if the market share of an exporting country is constant across all importing countries. Specialization is just one special case satisfying this condition. The constant-share condition can hold in a variety of situations where multiple producers compete with a homogeneous good. Further, this paper shows that the ratio of bilateral trade to the product of partner incomes is increasing in the extent of specialization and in the intensity of intra-industry trade. Since the relationship is not model-specific, the correlations among these variables do not support any specific model.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 508
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[2]   A RECIPROCAL DUMPING MODEL OF INTERNATIONAL-TRADE [J].
BRANDER, J ;
KRUGMAN, P .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 15 (3-4) :313-321
[3]   Borders and business cycles [J].
Clark, TE ;
van Wincoop, E .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 55 (01) :59-85
[5]  
Deardorff A., 1998, The Regionalization of the World Economy, P7, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226260228.003.0002
[6]   The economic significance of national border effects [J].
Evans, CL .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1291-1312
[7]   On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation [J].
Evenett, SJ ;
Keller, W .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (02) :281-316
[8]  
Feenstra R., 2004, ADV INT TRADE THEORY
[9]  
Feenstra R, 1998, 6804 NBER
[10]   Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade [J].
Feenstra, RC ;
Markusen, JR ;
Rose, AK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2001, 34 (02) :430-447