Assessing Site Waste Management Practices and Cost Between Conventional and Industrialised Building System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia

被引:1
作者
Abd Shukor, Ani Saifuza [1 ]
Idris, Nor Hanisah [2 ]
Bakri, Anis Sazira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Architecture Planning & Surveying, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia
[2] Archinteriors Engn, Singapore, Singapore
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
Waste management; construction waste; cost; Industrialised Building System; DEMOLITION WASTE; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.016
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Urban development and demands in the construction industry and the increasing population numbers have positively contributed to the rising waste generation. The growth and expansion of construction activities enhanced the problem of waste generation on construction sites. In the Malaysian construction industry, there is a pressing issue of minimising construction waste, which causes significant impacts on the environment. Malaysia is moving towards better construction waste management; however, there is still insufficient collection and improper construction waste disposal in projects site. Practices to reduce, reuse, or recycle waste have not yet achieved widespread implementation due to the cost incurred in handling and transporting the physical waste to the dumpsite. Thus, adopting an Industrialised Building System (IBS) has been one alternative to the conventional construction method to reduce construction waste. The research aim is to compare site waste management practices between conventional and IBS projects. The research examines the types of site waste generated from construction project activities, the types of site waste management practices, and the cost involved in managing site waste. The research methodology used qualitative research and used a case study approach. The data is gained from semi structured interviews with conventional and IBS contractors in Malaysia. The analysis is based on cross-case analysis and pattern matching. Findings from semi-structured interviews based on six comparative case studies revealed that there are some differences between the types of site waste generate by the conventional and IBS projects due to some causes such as improper storage and wrong handling material. Adopting an IBS can greatly minimize construction waste, saving the cost of materials, and improve the environmental performance for overall site conditions. This research shows that the government should play an important role by encourage all the construction company to implement IBS as the new way in minimizing the construction waste.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 163
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, CONSTR IND MAST PLAN
  • [2] Arif Mohammed, 2012, Construction Innovation, V12, P133, DOI 10.1108/14714171211215912
  • [3] Baldwin A. K, 2016, J CIVIL BUILDING ENG
  • [4] Begun R. A, 2010, J ENV SCI
  • [5] CIDB, 2008, GUIDELINES CONSTRUCT
  • [6] Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), 2015, CONSTR IND TRANSF PR
  • [7] Firmawan F., 2012, J TECHNOLOGY, P182
  • [8] Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe
    Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis
    Styles, David
    Schoenberger, Harald
    Zeschmar-Lahl, Barbara
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 136 : 166 - 178
  • [9] The on-site waste minimization practices for construction waste
    Hasmori, Muhammad Fikri
    Zin, Ahmad Faizul Md
    Nagapan, Sasitharan
    Deraman, Rafikullah
    Abas, Norhaslinda
    Yunus, Riduan
    Klufallah, Mustafa
    [J]. 2ND GLOBAL CONGRESS ON CONSTRUCTION, MATERIAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 713
  • [10] Jain M., 2012, Int. J. of Scientific and Research Publications, V2