Ghost imaging as loss estimation: Quantum versus classical schemes

被引:7
|
作者
Chiuri, A. [1 ]
Gianani, I [2 ]
Cimini, V [2 ,3 ]
De Dominicis, L. [1 ]
Genoni, M. G. [4 ]
Barbieri, M. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ric Frascati, ENEA, Via E Fermi 45, I-00044 Frascati, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tre, Dipartimento Sci, Via Vasca Navale 84, I-00146 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Roma, Dipartimento Fis, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Fis Aldo Pontremoli, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[5] Ist Nazl Ott INO CNR, Lgo E Fermi 6, I-50125 Florence, Italy
关键词
NOISE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.105.013506
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Frequency correlations are a versatile and powerful tool which can be exploited to perform spectral analysis of objects whose direct measurement might be unfeasible. This is achieved through a so-called ghost spectrometer that can be implemented with quantum and classical resources alike. While there are some known advantages associated to either choice, an analysis of their metrological capabilities has not yet been performed. Here we report on the metrological comparison between a quantum and a classical ghost spectrometer. We perform the estimation of the transmittivity of a bandpass filter using frequency-entangled photon pairs. Our results show that a quantum advantage is achievable, depending on the values of the transmittivity and on the number of frequency modes analyzed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High visibility temporal ghost imaging with classical light
    Liu, Jianbin
    Wang, Jingjing
    Chen, Hui
    Zheng, Huaibin
    Liu, Yanyan
    Zhou, Yu
    Li, Fu-li
    Xu, Zhuo
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 410 : 824 - 829
  • [32] Resolution and noise in ghost imaging with classical thermal light
    Key Laboratory for Quantum Optics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
    不详
    Chin. Phys., 2006, 9 (2002-2006):
  • [33] Ghost imaging of phase objects with classical incoherent light
    Shirai, Tomohiro
    Setala, Tero
    Friberg, Ari T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2011, 84 (04):
  • [34] Resolution and noise in ghost imaging with classical thermal light
    Cheng Jing
    Han Shen-Sheng
    Yan Yi-Jing
    CHINESE PHYSICS, 2006, 15 (09): : 2002 - 2006
  • [35] The Generations of Classical Correlations via Quantum Schemes
    Chen, Zhenyu
    Lin, Lijinzhi
    Lin, Xiaodie
    Wei, Zhaohui
    Yao, Penghui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2024, 70 (06) : 4160 - 4169
  • [36] Classical versus quantum completeness
    Hofmann, Stefan
    Schneider, Marc
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2015, 91 (12):
  • [37] Quantum versus classical uncertainty
    Luo, SL
    THEORETICAL AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 143 (02) : 681 - 688
  • [38] Quantum versus Classical Information
    Bub, Jeffrey
    WHAT IS QUANTUM INFORMATION?, 2017, : 79 - 92
  • [39] Quantum versus classical learnability
    Servedio, RA
    Gortler, SJ
    16TH ANNUAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 138 - 148
  • [40] CLASSICAL VERSUS QUANTUM INTEGRABILITY
    HIETARINTA, J
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 25 (06) : 1833 - 1840