The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

被引:6
|
作者
Sobczuk, Pawel [1 ,2 ]
Kozak, Katarzyna [1 ]
Kopec, Sylwia [1 ]
Rogala, Pawel [1 ]
Switaj, Tomasz [1 ]
Kosela-Paterczyk, Hanna [1 ]
Gos, Aleksandra [3 ]
Tysarowski, Andrzej [3 ,4 ]
Rutkowski, Piotr [1 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Bone Sarcoma & Melanoma, Dept Soft Tissue, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Lab Ctr Preclin Res, Dept Expt & Clin Physiol, PL-02097 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Dept Mol & Translat Oncol, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[4] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst, Canc Mol & Genet Diagnost Dept, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
melanoma; liquid biopsy; ctDNA; BRAF; MEK inhibitors; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; METASTATIC MELANOMA; DABRAFENIB; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; VEMURAFENIB; TRAMETINIB; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14030777
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40-50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naive melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined BRAF-Targeted Therapy with Immunotherapy in BRAF-Mutated Advanced Melanoma Patients
    Ferrucci, Pier Francesco
    Lens, Marko
    Cocorocchio, Emilia
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 23 (12)
  • [22] Clinical and therapeutic implications of BRAF mutation heterogeneity in metastatic melanoma
    Ardakani, Nima Mesbah
    Leslie, Connull
    Grieu-Iacopetta, Fabienne
    Lam, Wei-Sen
    Budgeon, Charley
    Millward, Michael
    Amanuel, Benhur
    PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2017, 30 (02) : 233 - 242
  • [23] Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
    Mangana, Joanna
    Zihler, Deborah
    Bossart, Simon
    Broennimann, Daniel
    Zachariah, Ralph
    Gerard, Camille Lea
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (05) : 366 - 372
  • [24] Mutation landscape in melanoma patients clinical implications of heterogeneity of BRAF mutations
    Heinzerling, L.
    Baiter, M.
    Kuehnapfel, S.
    Schuler, G.
    Keikavoussi, P.
    Agaimy, A.
    Kiesewetter, F.
    Hartmann, A.
    Schneider-Stock, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (11) : 2833 - 2841
  • [25] Comparison of BRAF Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients
    Colombino, Maria
    Rozzo, Carla
    Paliogiannis, Panagiotis
    Casula, Milena
    Manca, Antonella
    Doneddu, Valentina
    Fedeli, Maria Antonietta
    Sini, Maria Cristina
    Palomba, Grazia
    Pisano, Marina
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Caraco, Corrado
    Lissia, Amelia
    Cossu, Antonio
    Palmieri, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 14
  • [26] The association between immune checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy and uveitis in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma
    Dimitriou, Florentia
    Urner-Bloch, Ursula
    Eggenschwiler, Corinne
    Mitsakakis, Nicholas
    Mangana, Joanna
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Urner, Martin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 144 : 215 - 223
  • [27] Clinical meaning of BRAF mutation in Korean patients with advanced colorectal cancer
    Kim, Bun
    Park, Soo Jung
    Cheon, Jae Hee
    Kim, Tae Il
    Kim, Won Ho
    Hong, Sung Pil
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (15) : 4370 - 4376
  • [28] BRAF inhibitor treatment is feasible in the oldest-old advanced melanoma patients
    Kohtamaki, Laura M.
    Hernberg, Micaela
    Jaakkola, Marjut
    Makela, Siru
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2021, 31 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [29] Plasma BRAF Mutation Detection for the Diagnostic and Monitoring Trajectory of Patients with LDH-High Stage IV Melanoma
    Tolmeijer, Sofie H.
    Koornstra, Rutger H. T.
    de Groot, Jan Willem B.
    Geerlings, Maartje J.
    van Rens, Dirk H.
    Boers-Sonderen, Marye J.
    Schalken, Jack A.
    Gerritsen, Winald R.
    Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L.
    Mehra, Niven
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [30] Vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma patients in real-world clinical practice: prognostic factors associated with clinical outcomes
    Schouwenburg, Maartje G.
    Jochems, Anouk
    Leeneman, Brenda
    Franken, Margreet G.
    van den Eertwegh, Alfons J. M.
    Haanen, John B. A. G.
    van Zeijl, Michiel C. T.
    Aarts, Maureen J.
    van Akkooi, Alexander C. J.
    van den Berkmortel, Franchette W. P. J.
    Blokx, Willeke A. M.
    de Groot, Jan Willem B.
    Hospers, Geke A. P.
    Kapiteijn, Ellen
    Koornstra, Rutger H.
    Kruit, Wim H.
    Louwman, Marieke W. J.
    Piersma, Djura
    van Rijn, Rozemarijn S.
    Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P. M.
    ten Tije, Albert J.
    Vreugdenhil, Gerard
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    van der Hoeven, Jacobus J. M.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (04) : 326 - 332