Seeing invisible support: Understanding provider motivation, intent, and enactment of support

被引：2

作者：

Mason, Adam J. ^{[1
]}

Shebib, Samantha J. ^{[2
]}

Boumis, Josephine K. ^{[3
]}

Allard, Amanda ^{[1
]}

Holmstrom, Amanda J. ^{[1
]}

Mazur, Allison ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Commun, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA

[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Commun Studies, Birmingham, AL USA

[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Commun, Tampa, FL 33620 USA

[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Commun, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA

来源：

PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS | 2022年 / 29卷 / 03期

关键词：

interpersonal; invisible support; qualitative; social support; SOCIAL SUPPORT; EMOTIONAL SUPPORT; COUPLES; VISIBILITY; ADJUSTMENT; RESPONSES;

D O I：

10.1111/pere.12438

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

The concept of invisible support (Bolger et al., 2000) has sparked interest among social support researchers. Theoretically, invisible support avoids negative support outcomes related to face threats and, therefore, should lead to better outcomes than traditional support. Unfortunately, empirical tests of invisible support have yielded inconsistent results, potentially due to a lack of conceptual and operational clarity in defining invisible support. The present study addresses this issue, advocating for the inclusion of provider intention to reduce support visibility in the definition of invisible support and establishing the foundation for a typology of invisible support by eliciting participants' experiences with its provision.

引用

页码：581 / 598

页数：18

共 43 条

[11] Navigating relational turbulence in the wake of weight loss transitions: A support marshaling analysis [J].

Crowley, John P. ;

Burke, Tricia ;

Denes, Amanda ;

Allred, Ryan ;

Carberry, Emmalene .

PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2020, 27 (03) :630-651

[12] Support marshaling for romantic relationships: Empirical validation of a support marshaling typology [J].

Crowley, John P. ;

Faw, Meara H. .

PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2014, 21 (02) :242-257

[13] CONTROLLABILITY OF STRESSFUL EVENTS AND SATISFACTION WITH SPOUSE SUPPORT BEHAVIORS [J].

CUTRONA, CE ;

SUHR, JA .

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (02) :154-174

[14] PRIMARY AND SECONDARY GOALS IN THE PRODUCTION OF INTERPERSONAL INFLUENCE MESSAGES [J].

DILLARD, JP ;

SEGRIN, C ;

HARDEN, JM .

COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1989, 56 (01) :19-38

[15] Interpersonal Motives and Supportive Communication [J].

Frisby, Brandi N. ;

Martin, Matthew M. .

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2010, 27 (04) :320-329

[16] Facilitating Autonomy in Interdependent Relationships: Invisible Support Facilitates Highly Avoidant Individuals' Autonomy [J].

Girme, Yuthika U. ;

Overall, Nickola C. ;

Hammond, Matthew D. .

JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) :154-165

[17] Does Support Need to Be Seen? Daily Invisible Support Promotes Next Day Relationship Well-Being [J].

Girme, Yuthika U. ;

Maniaci, Michael R. ;

Reis, Harry T. ;

McNulty, James K. ;

Carmichael, Cheryl L. ;

Gable, Shelly L. ;

Baker, Levi R. ;

Overall, Nickola C. .

JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 32 (07) :882-893

[18] When Visibility Matters: Short-Term Versus Long-Term Costs and Benefits of Visible and Invisible Support [J].

Girme, Yuthika U. ;

Overall, Nickola C. ;

Simpson, Jeffry A. .

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2013, 39 (11) :1441-1454

[19] Gaps Among Desired, Sought, and Received Support: Deficits and Surpluses in Support When Coping With Taboo Marital Stressors [J].

High, Andrew C. ;

Crowley, Jenny L. .

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2018, 45 (03) :319-338

[20] Explaining the Durable Effects of Verbal Person-Centered Supportive Communication: Indirect Effects or Invisible Support? [J].

High, Andrew C. ;

Solomon, Denise Haunani .

HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (02) :200-220

← 1 2 3 4 5 →