A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction of Traffic Speed in Urban Places

被引:40
作者
Bratsas, Charalampos [1 ,2 ]
Koupidis, Kleanthis [1 ,2 ]
Salanova, Josep-Maria [3 ]
Giannakopoulos, Konstantinos [1 ]
Kaloudis, Aristeidis [1 ]
Aifadopoulou, Georgia [3 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Math, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Open Knowledge Fdn Greece, Thessaloniki 54352, Greece
[3] Ctr Res & Technol Hellas, Hellen Inst Transport, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
traffic prediction; machine learning; neural networks; SVR; random forest; multiple linear regression; TRAVEL-TIME PREDICTION; FLOW PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/su12010142
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rising interest in the field of Intelligent Transportation Systems combined with the increased availability of collected data allows the study of different methods for prevention of traffic congestion in cities. A common need in all of these methods is the use of traffic predictions for supporting planning and operation of the traffic lights and traffic management schemes. This paper focuses on comparing the forecasting effectiveness of three machine learning models, namely Random Forests, Support Vector Regression, and Multilayer Perceptron-in addition to Multiple Linear Regression-using probe data collected from the road network of Thessaloniki, Greece. The comparison was conducted with multiple tests clustered in three types of scenarios. The first scenario tests the algorithms on specific randomly selected dates on different randomly selected roads. The second scenario tests the algorithms on randomly selected roads over eight consecutive 15 min intervals; the third scenario tests the algorithms on random roads for the duration of a whole day. The experimental results show that while the Support Vector Regression model performs best at stable conditions with minor variations, the Multilayer Perceptron model adapts better to circumstances with greater variations, in addition to having the most near-zero errors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] Bian ZQ, 2019, AM J CANCER RES, V9, P22
  • [12] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [13] Online-SVR for short-term traffic flow prediction under typical and atypical traffic conditions
    Castro-Neto, Manoel
    Jeong, Young-Seon
    Jeong, Myong-Kee
    Han, Lee D.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) : 6164 - 6173
  • [14] Chen CY, 2011, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P607, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2011.5940418
  • [15] Real-time travel time prediction using particle filtering with a non-explicit state-transition model
    Chen, Hao
    Rakha, Hesham A.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 43 : 112 - 126
  • [16] Chen Y, 2011, 2011 INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON BIOMEDICAL TEXTILE MATERIALS, PROCEEDINGS, P3
  • [17] Travel Time Prediction: Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in a Case Study
    Goudarzi, Forough
    [J]. IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS / IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY / IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS (HPCC/SMARTCITY/DSS), 2018, : 1404 - 1407
  • [18] Multisource Data Framework for Road Traffic State Estimation
    Grau, Josep Maria Salanova
    Mitsakis, Evangelos
    Tzenos, Panagiotis
    Stamos, Iraklis
    Selmi, Luigi
    Aifadopoulou, Georgia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2018,
  • [19] James G, 2013, SPRINGER TEXTS STAT, V103, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7_1
  • [20] Kazic Blaz, 2015, 1st International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS 2015). Proceedings, P119