Antibacterial Activity Against Foodborne Staphylococcus aureus and Antioxidant Capacity of Various Pure Phenolic Compounds

被引:39
作者
Rua, Javier [2 ]
Fernandez-Alvarez, Laura [2 ]
de Castro, Cristina [2 ]
del Valle, Pilar [2 ]
de Arriaga, Dolores [2 ]
Rosario Garcia-Armesto, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leon, Dept Food Hyg & Food Technol, Leon 24007, Spain
[2] Univ Leon, Dept Mol Biol, Leon 24007, Spain
关键词
BUTYLATED HYDROXYANISOLE; CARVACROL; THYMOL; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MECHANISMS; FLAVONOIDS; RESISTANCE; AGENTS; ACID; MEAT;
D O I
10.1089/fpd.2010.0659
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Six pure phenolic compounds (hydroquinone, thymol, carvacrol, butylated hydroxyanisole, gallic acid, and octyl gallate) were tested for their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) against several strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dairy and meat products. In addition, S. aureus reference strains (American Type Culture Collection) for antimicrobial studies and/or isolated from human infections and outbreaks of food poisoning were included in the study. Of the compounds tested, octyl gallate and hydroquinone were the most effective against S. aureus (mean MIC values of 20.89 and 103.05 mu g/mL, respectively) and carvacrol and thymol the least (mean MIC values of about 413 mu g/mL). The mean MBC values were 40.84, 194.37, 417.46, and 581.90 mu g/mL for octyl gallate, hydroquinone, carvacrol, and thymol, respectively. Meat isolates were more resistant than those of dairy origin to hydroquinone, gallic acid, and octyl gallate, as well as to penicillin G (used as a control of the methodology used); gallic acid and penicillin G showed the highest differences in MIC values between the groups of strains (about 10 and 200 times, respectively). On the other hand, when we tested the isolates included in each group of strains (dairy, meat, and other/mixed sources) we only detected significant differences (p<0.05) among dairy and isolates from other/mixed sources for hydroquinone and thymol, respectively. However, strains of meat origin exhibited significant differences among each other (p<0.05) to most of the phenolic compounds tested (hydroquinone, carvacrol, gallic acid, and octyl gallate). The relationship between MICs and MBCs for each of the phenolic compounds tested suggested a bactericidal mechanism of action against S. aureus. Gallic acid and octyl gallate exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity and thymol and carvacrol the lowest. So, octyl gallate is an agent with both antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, which would be of interest to use in the food industry.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 157
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   ANTIOXIDANT ACTIONS OF THYMOL, CARVACROL, 6-GINGEROL, ZINGERONE AND HYDROXYTYROSOL [J].
AESCHBACH, R ;
LOLIGER, J ;
SCOTT, BC ;
MURCIA, A ;
BUTLER, J ;
HALLIWELL, B ;
ARUOMA, OI .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (01) :31-36
[2]   Antibacterial action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Akiyama, H ;
Fujii, K ;
Yamasaki, O ;
Oono, T ;
Iwatsuki, K .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 (04) :487-491
[3]   EVALUATION OF THE ANTIOXIDANT AND PROOXIDANT ACTIONS OF GALLIC ACID AND ITS DERIVATIVES [J].
ARUOMA, OI ;
MURCIA, A ;
BUTLER, J ;
HALLIWELL, B .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1993, 41 (11) :1880-1885
[4]  
Aziz NH, 1998, MICROBIOS, V93, P43
[5]  
Baratta M. T., 1998, Journal of Essential Oil Research, V10, P618
[6]  
Barry A., 1976, The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test: Principle and Practices
[7]  
BRAND-WILLIAMS W, 1995, FOOD SCI TECHNOL-LEB, V28, P25
[8]   Antioxidant and prooxidant behavior of flavonoids: Structure-activity relationships [J].
Cao, GH ;
Sofic, E ;
Prior, RL .
FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1997, 22 (05) :749-760
[9]  
Davidson PM, 2007, FOOD MICROBIOLOGY: FUNDAMENTALS AND FRONTIERS, THIRD EDITION, P713
[10]   Evaluating in vitro antimicrobial activity of thymol toward hygiene-indicating and pathogenic bacteria [J].
Falcone, Pasquale M. ;
Mastromatteo, Marianna ;
Del Nobile, Matteo A. ;
Corbo, Maria R. ;
Sinigaglia, Milena .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2007, 70 (02) :425-431