Validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE™) within an international study exploring bereaved relatives' perceptions about quality of care in the last days of life

被引:4
作者
Mayland, Catriona R. [1 ]
Keetharuth, Anju D. [2 ]
Mukuria, Clara [2 ]
Haugen, Dagny Faksvag [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Palliat Med, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Haukeland Hosp, Reg Ctr Excellence Palliat Care, Bergen, Norway
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Palliative care; terminal care; psychometrics; factor analysis; quality of care; quality of death; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; MENTAL-HEALTH; DEATH; QUESTIONNAIRE; DISCUSSIONS; FACILITATE; SERVICES; VIEWS; WELL; HOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.340
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Assessing quality of care provided during the dying phase using validated tools aids quality assurance and recognizes unmet need. Objective. To assess construct validity and internal consistency of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE (TM)) within an international context. Methods. Post-bereavement survey (August 2017 to September 2018) using CODE (TM). Respondents were next-of-kin to adult patients (>= 18 years old) with cancer who had an 'expected' death within 22 study site hospitals in 7 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom, Uruguay. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA) were conducted, and internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach alpha (alpha). Known group validity was assessed by ability to discriminate quality of care based in place (Palliative Care Units (PCUs)) and country (Poland, where most deaths were in PCUs) of care. Differences were quantified using effect sizes (ES). Results. A 914 CODE (TM) questionnaires completed (54% response rate). 527 (58%) male deceased patients; 610 (67%) next-of-kin female who were most commonly the 'spouse/partner' (411, 45%). EFA identified 4 factors: 'Overall care,' 'Communication and support,' 'Trust, respect and dignity,' and 'Symptom management' with good reliability scores (alpha = 0.628 - 0.862). CFA confirmed the 4-factor model; these were highly correlated and a bifactor model showed acceptable fit. The ES for quality of care in PCU's was 0.727; ES for Poland was 0.657, supporting the sensitivity of CODE (TM) to detect differences. Conclusion. Within an international context, good evidence supports the validity and reliability of CODE (TM) for assessing the quality of care provided in the last days of life. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:E23 / E33
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[2]  
Fayers PM., 2007, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
[3]   An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data [J].
Flora, DB ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (04) :466-491
[4]   One chance to get it right: improving clinical handovers for better symptom control at the end of life [J].
Goldraij, Gabriel ;
Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana ;
Aloisio, Melisa ;
Castro, Sandra Analia ;
Gerlach, Christina ;
Mayland, Catriona Rachel ;
Haugen, Dagny Faksvag .
BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2021, 10 (03)
[5]  
Hanson BA, 1998, J EDUC BEHAV STAT, V23, P244, DOI 10.2307/1165247
[6]   Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives' Survey within Seven Countries [J].
Haugen, Dagny Faksvag ;
Hufthammer, Karl Ove ;
Gerlach, Christina ;
Sigurdardottir, Katrin ;
Hansen, Marit Irene Tuen ;
Ting, Grace ;
Tripodoro, Vilma Adriana ;
Goldraij, Gabriel ;
Yanneo, Eduardo Garcia ;
Leppert, Wojciech ;
Wolszczak, Katarzyna ;
Zambon, Lair ;
Passarini, Juliana Nalin ;
Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda ;
Weber, Martin ;
Ellershaw, John ;
Mayland, Catriona Rachel .
ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (07) :E1273-E1284
[7]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[8]   CONSENSUS METHODS FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH [J].
JONES, J ;
HUNTER, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7001) :376-380
[9]   Exploring the item sets of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures using factor analysis [J].
Keetharuth, Anju Devianee ;
Bjorner, Jakob Bue ;
Barkham, Michael ;
Browne, John ;
Croudace, Tim ;
Brazier, John .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (04) :1005-1015
[10]   Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties [J].
Kupeli, Nuriye ;
Candy, Bridget ;
Tamura-Rose, Gabrielle ;
Schofield, Guy ;
Webber, Natalie ;
Hicks, Stephanie E. ;
Floyd, Theodore ;
Vivat, Bella ;
Sampson, Elizabeth L. ;
Stone, Patrick ;
Aspden, Trefor .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (02) :183-197