Total parietal peritonectomy in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

被引:5
作者
Yokosu, Kota [1 ,2 ]
Tanabe, Hiroshi [1 ,2 ]
Nomura, Shogo [3 ]
Ozone, Hirokazu [1 ]
Saito, Motoaki [1 ]
Takano, Hirokuni [1 ]
Okamoto, Aikou [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Minato Ku, 3-19-18 Nishishinbashi, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Gynecol, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Biostat, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
来源
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS | 2021年 / 37卷
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Recurrence; Complete Surgery; Debulking Surgery; Peritonectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2021.100805
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The object of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer. This retrospective single-center study analyzed 16 patients with FIGO stages IIIC-IVB epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent TPP in PDS and achieved macroscopically complete resection between April 2015 and June 2016. The median age of 16 patients was 52.5 years old. 12 were in stage IIIC and 4 were in stage IV. Regarding intraoperative complications, unintended diaphragm perforation was observed in two patients. Regarding postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3-5) before the adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph cysts occured in 3 patients, intra-abdominal abscess in 3, ileus in 2, pancreatic fistula in 1 and temporary kidney failure in 1. Regarding postoperative complications (grade 3-5) after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, diaphragmatic hernia occured in 1 patient, ileus in 2 and intra-abdominal abscess in 2. Except 1 patient who relapsed approximately one month from surgery and died, the other 15 patients overcamed complications and recovered without problems in daily life. This analysis was conducted 3 years after all patients underwent PDS, with the 3-year progression-free and overall survival of 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.9-81.1) and 87.5% (95 %CI, 58.6-96.7), respectively. Based on the above results, TPP in PDS may improve the prognosis compared to previous reports such as LION trial. On the other hand, complications may increase. Therefore, further studies are necessary on its safety and efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer
    Li, Sue
    Manning-Geist, Beryl
    Gockley, Allison
    Ramos, Amanda
    Sisodia, Rachel C.
    Del Carmen, Marcela
    Growdon, Whitfield B.
    Horowitz, Neil
    Berkowitz, Ross
    Worley Jr, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (07) : 1052 - 1057
  • [32] Residual tumor and primary debulking surgery vs interval debulking surgery in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer
    Sorensen, Sarah Mejer
    Hogdall, Claus
    Mosgaard, Berit Jul
    Dalgaard, Maya Isabella Riise
    Jensen, Mai Partridge
    Fuglsang, Katrine
    Schnack, Tine Henrichsen
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 101 (03) : 334 - 343
  • [33] Primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Seward, Shelly M.
    Winer, Ira
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2015, 34 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [34] Success rate and safety of tumor debulking with diaphragmatic surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and peritoneal cancer
    Saitou, Motoaki
    Iida, Yasushi
    Komazaki, Hiromi
    Narui, Chikage
    Matsuno, Kanae
    Kawabata, Ayako
    Ueda, Kazu
    Tanabe, Hiroshi
    Takakura, Satoshi
    Isonishi, Seiji
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Okamoto, Aikou
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (03) : 641 - 646
  • [35] Success rate and safety of tumor debulking with diaphragmatic surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and peritoneal cancer
    Motoaki Saitou
    Yasushi Iida
    Hiromi Komazaki
    Chikage Narui
    Kanae Matsuno
    Ayako Kawabata
    Kazu Ueda
    Hiroshi Tanabe
    Satoshi Takakura
    Seiji Isonishi
    Hiroshi Sasaki
    Aikou Okamoto
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 641 - 646
  • [36] Radical en bloc peritonectomy in advanced ovarian cancer
    Lago, Victor
    Domingo, Santiago
    Matute, Luis
    Padilla-Iserte, Pablo
    Gurrea, Marta
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [37] Impact of the Time Interval Between Primary Debulking Surgery and Start of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Lin, Hao
    Chen, Wen-Hsin
    Wu, Chen-Hsuan
    Ou, Yu-Che
    Chen, Yu-Jen
    Chen, Ying-Yi
    Lin, Yu-Han
    Fu, Hung-Chun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 5413 - 5422
  • [38] The prognostic effect of residual tumor for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery
    Shi-Ping Yang
    Jian-Xian Chen
    Jing-Ying Xu
    Lei, Jian
    San-Gang Wu
    Zhou, Juan
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (14): : 2836 - 2845
  • [39] Risk-prediction model of severe postoperative complications after primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Kumar, Amanika
    Janco, Jo Marie
    Mariani, Andrea
    Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.
    Langstraat, Carrie L.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    McGree, Michaela E.
    Cliby, William A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 140 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [40] Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Propensity-matched Analysis
    Siesto, Gabriele
    Cavina, Raffaele
    Romano, Fabrizio
    Vitobello, Domenico
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (03): : 280 - 285