Total parietal peritonectomy in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Yokosu, Kota [1 ,2 ]
Tanabe, Hiroshi [1 ,2 ]
Nomura, Shogo [3 ]
Ozone, Hirokazu [1 ]
Saito, Motoaki [1 ]
Takano, Hirokuni [1 ]
Okamoto, Aikou [1 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Minato Ku, 3-19-18 Nishishinbashi, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Gynecol, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Dept Biostat, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
来源
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS | 2021年 / 37卷
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Recurrence; Complete Surgery; Debulking Surgery; Peritonectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.gore.2021.100805
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The object of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer. This retrospective single-center study analyzed 16 patients with FIGO stages IIIC-IVB epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent TPP in PDS and achieved macroscopically complete resection between April 2015 and June 2016. The median age of 16 patients was 52.5 years old. 12 were in stage IIIC and 4 were in stage IV. Regarding intraoperative complications, unintended diaphragm perforation was observed in two patients. Regarding postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3-5) before the adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph cysts occured in 3 patients, intra-abdominal abscess in 3, ileus in 2, pancreatic fistula in 1 and temporary kidney failure in 1. Regarding postoperative complications (grade 3-5) after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, diaphragmatic hernia occured in 1 patient, ileus in 2 and intra-abdominal abscess in 2. Except 1 patient who relapsed approximately one month from surgery and died, the other 15 patients overcamed complications and recovered without problems in daily life. This analysis was conducted 3 years after all patients underwent PDS, with the 3-year progression-free and overall survival of 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.9-81.1) and 87.5% (95 %CI, 58.6-96.7), respectively. Based on the above results, TPP in PDS may improve the prognosis compared to previous reports such as LION trial. On the other hand, complications may increase. Therefore, further studies are necessary on its safety and efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upper abdominal debulking surgery for ovarian cancer total colectomy, total peritonectomy, and extended upper abdominal debulking surgery
    Taskiran, Cagatay
    Vatansever, Dogan
    Giray, Burak
    Eraslan, Alper
    Tanju, Serhan
    Arvas, Macit
    Balik, Emre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (10) : 1648 - 1649
  • [2] Barriers to Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Latin America
    Paulino, Eduardo
    Rodrigues, Angelica Nogueira
    Strasser-Weippl, Kathrin
    St Louis, Jessica
    Bukowski, Alexandra
    Goss, Paul E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (08) : 1645 - 1649
  • [3] Total rectosigmoidectomy versus partial rectal resection in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Plotti, F.
    Montera, R.
    Aloisi, A.
    Scaletta, G.
    Capriglione, S.
    Luvero, D.
    Nardone, C. De Cicco
    Basile, S.
    Panici, P. Benedetti
    Angioli, R.
    EJSO, 2016, 42 (03): : 383 - 390
  • [4] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Ce Bian
    Kui Yao
    Li Li
    Tao Yi
    Xia Zhao
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 163 - 168
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Bian, Ce
    Yao, Kui
    Li, Li
    Yi, Tao
    Zhao, Xia
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [6] Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Primary or Interval Debulking? Five Categories of Patients in View of the Results of Randomized Trials and Tumor Biology: Primary Debulking Surgery and Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Makar, Amin P.
    Trope, Claes G.
    Tummers, Philippe
    Denys, Hannelore
    Vandecasteele, Katrien
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (06) : 745 - 754
  • [7] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [8] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [9] Classification and morbidity of debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Vincens, E.
    Lauratet, B.
    Lefranc, J. -P.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (01) : 73 - 77
  • [10] Timing of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, I.
    van Gorp, T.
    Amant, F.
    Leunen, K.
    Neven, P.
    Berteloot, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 : 11 - 19