Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of coriander seed production using material flow cost accounting and life cycle assessment

被引:16
作者
Dekamin, Majid [1 ]
Kheiralipour, Kamran [2 ]
Afshar, Reza Keshavarz [3 ]
机构
[1] Malayer Univ, Plant Prod & Genet Dept, Malayer, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Ilam Univ, Mech Engn Biosyst Dept, Ilam, Iran
[3] Rodale Inst, Kutztown, PA USA
关键词
Economic productivity; Energy efficiency; Environmental impacts; Greenhouse gases; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; WHEAT PRODUCTION; USE EFFICIENCY; INPUTS; FOOTPRINT; PROVINCE; SYSTEMS; MFCA; CROP;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-21585-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The agricultural sector in the world is facing social expectations to improve energy efficiency and reduce environmental impacts, and at the same producing enough food and fiber for the growing world population. The purpose of the present research is to determine the economic, energy consumption, and environmental impacts in coriander seed production using material flow cost accounting approach along with life cycle assessment. The positive output and negative energy were 25,485 and 6742 MJ ha(-1), respectively. Energy efficiency, net energy gain, specific energy, and energy productivity indicators were calculated as 0.6, - 11,944 MJ ha(-1), 17.4 MJ kg(-1), and 0.06 kg MJ(-1), respectively. The average production cost was calculated as 588 $ ha(-1) whereas gross income was 1267 $ ha(-1). The value of negative products in coriander production was estimated as 239 $ ha(-1). Seed shedding at harvest and water loss due to inefficient irrigation system were found to be the major negative products (economic and energy) in the system that can enhance the system productivity upon improvement. The values of benefit costs ratio and economic productivity were 1.74 and 3 kg $(-1), respectively. The acidification potential (102.5 kg SO2 eq ha(-1)), global warming potential (897.3 kg CO2 eq ha(-1)), photochemical oxidation potential (0.13 kg C2H4 eq ha(-1)), and eutrophication potential (40.3 kg PO4-3 eq ha(-1)) indicators were evaluated. The hotspots in point of economic (labor and seed shedding), energy use (nitrogen fertilizer and machinery) and energy loss (seed shedding), and environment (diesel fuel consumption) were determined which can be used to optimize coriander production through decreasing the material and energy consumption in the field. The results showed that MFCA combined with LCA is a powerful tool in identifying hotspots in crop production systems and can be used in developing more sustainable systems as well as in developing sustainability models.
引用
收藏
页码:83469 / 83482
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]   Improving energy use efficiency of canola production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach [J].
Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem ;
Rafiee, Shahin ;
Jafari, Ali ;
Mohammadi, Ali .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) :2765-2772
[42]   Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use [J].
Muller, Adrian .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 94 (3-4) :319-331
[43]   Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems [J].
Naseri, Hakim ;
Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami ;
Ranjbar, Iraj ;
Zamani, Davood Mohammad .
ENERGY, 2021, 217
[44]  
Nemecek T, 2007, 15 SWISS CTR LIF CYC
[45]  
Nemecek T., 2014, Methodological Guidelines for the Life Cycle Inventory of Agricultural Products
[46]  
Nemecek T., 2007, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORI, P1
[47]   Energy budgeting and carbon footprints of three tillage systems in maize-wheat sequence of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains [J].
Nisar, Shahida ;
Benbi, Dinesh Kumar ;
Toor, Amardeep Singh .
ENERGY, 2021, 229
[48]  
Nyide C. J., 2016, RISK GOVERNANCE CONT, DOI [10.22495/rcgv6i4c3art8, DOI 10.22495/RCGV6I4C3ART8]
[49]   Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture [J].
Ozkan, B ;
Akcaoz, H ;
Fert, C .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2004, 29 (01) :39-51
[50]  
Pourmehdi K., 2020, Advances in Environmental Technology, V2, P111, DOI DOI 10.22104/AET.2021.4704.1280