extreme events;
predictions;
public policy;
risk;
uncertainty;
vulnerability;
D O I:
10.1111/1539-6924.00357
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Public policies to mitigate the impacts of extreme events such as hurricanes or terrorist attacks will differ depending on whether they focus on reducing risk or reducing vulnerability. Here we present and defend six assertions aimed at exploring the benefits of vulnerability-based policies. (1) Risk-based approaches to covering the costs of extreme events do not depend for their success on reduction of vulnerability. (2) Risk-based approaches to preparing for extreme events are focused on acquiring accurate probabilistic information about the events themselves. (3) Understanding and reducing vulnerability does not demand accurate predictions of the incidence of extreme events. (4) Extreme events are created by context. (5) It is politically difficult to justify vulnerability reduction on economic grounds. (6) Vulnerability reduction is a human rights issue; risk reduction is not.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 810
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]
PIELKE RA, 2000, ENSO SIGNAL, V13, P5
[2]
PIELKE RA, 2000, ENERGY ENV, V11, P255
[3]
SAREWITZ D, 2000, PREDICTION SCI POLIT
[4]
Sarewitz D., 2000, ATLANTIC MONTHLY, V286, P5464