A comparative life cycle assessment between green walls and green facades in the Mediterranean continental climate

被引:22
作者
Chafer, Marta [1 ,2 ]
Perez, Gabriel [3 ]
Coma, Julia [3 ]
Cabeza, Luisa F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lleida, GREiA Res Grp, Pere de Cabrera S-N, Lleida 25001, Spain
[2] Univ Perugia, CIRIAF Interuniv Res Ctr, Via G Duranti 67, I-06125 Perugia, Italy
[3] Univ Lleida, Dept Comp Sci & Ind Engn, C Jaume II 69, Lleida 25001, Spain
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Green wall; Green facade; Environmental impact; ReCiPe; GWP; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY SAVINGS; BUILDINGS; SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111236
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The building and construction sector is a large contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and consumes vast natural resources. Improvements in this sector are of fundamental importance for national and global targets to combat climate change. In this context, vertical greenery systems (VGS) in buildings have become popular in urban areas to restore green space in cities and be an adaptation strategy for challenges such as climate change. However, only a small amount of knowledge is available on the different VGS environmental impacts. This paper discusses a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) between a building with green walls, a building with green facades and a reference building without any greenery system in the continental Mediterranean climate. This life cycle assessment is carried according to ISO 14040/44 using ReCiPe and GWP indicators. Moreover, this study fills this gap by thoroughly tracking and quantifying all impacts in all phases of the building life cycle related to the manufacturing and construction stage, maintenance, use stage (operational energy use experimentally tested), and final disposal. The adopted functional unit is the square meter of the facade. Results showed that the operational stage had the highest impact contributing by up to 90% of the total environmental impacts during its 50 years life cycle. Moreover, when considering VGS, there is an annual reduction of about 1% in the environmental burdens. However, in summer, the reduction is almost 50%. Finally, if the use stage is excluded, the manufacturing and the maintenance stage are the most significant contributors, especially in the green wall system. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [21] Goedkoop M.J., 2008, CATEGORY INDICATORS, DOI [10.2307/40184439, DOI 10.2307/40184439]
  • [22] Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Futures
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Huppes, Gjalt
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Masoni, Paolo
    Buonamici, Roberto
    Ekvall, Tomas
    Rydberg, Tomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [23] Hauschild M.Z., 2017, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
  • [24] ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Steinmann, Zoran J. N.
    Elshout, Pieter M. F.
    Stam, Gea
    Verones, Francesca
    Vieira, Marisa
    Zijp, Michiel
    Hollander, Anne
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02) : 138 - 147
  • [25] How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Messineo, Antonio
    Beltramo, Riccardo
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 : 556 - 569
  • [26] International Energy Agency (IEA), 2020, GLOBAL ENERGY REV, DOI [10.1787/90c8c125-en, DOI 10.1787/90C8C125-EN]
  • [27] Life cycle impact assessment and interpretation of municipal solid waste management scenarios based on the midpoint and endpoint approaches
    Yi, Sora
    Kurisu, Kiyo H.
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (07) : 652 - 668
  • [28] Carbon sequestration potential for mitigating the carbon footprint of green stormwater infrastructure
    Kavehei, Emad
    Jenkins, G. A.
    Adame, M. F.
    Lemckert, C.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 : 1179 - 1191
  • [29] Urban heat stress mitigation potential of green walls: A review
    Koch, Kyra
    Ysebaert, Tess
    Denys, Siegfried
    Samson, Roeland
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2020, 55
  • [30] Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities
    Lafortezza, Raffaele
    Chen, Jiquan
    van den Bosc, Cecil Konijnendijk
    Randrup, Thomas B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 165 : 431 - 441