Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

被引:29
作者
Hollemans, Eva [1 ]
Verhoef, Esther I. [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [2 ]
Rietbergen, John [3 ]
Helleman, Jozien [2 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [2 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate carcinoma; radical prostatectomy; positive surgical margin; cribriform; biochemical recurrence; GLEASON SCORE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CANCER; RISK; SURVIVAL; TUMOR; PATTERNS; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0000000000001384
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Postoperative biochemical recurrence occurs in up to 40% of prostate carcinoma patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Primary tumor grade and cribriform architecture are important parameters for clinical outcome; however, their relevance at positive surgical margins has not been completely elucidated yet. We reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens and recorded pT-stage, surgical margin status, Grade Group, and cribriform architecture of the primary tumor and at positive surgical margins. Clinicopathologic parameters and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) were used as endpoints. Positive surgical margins were present in 284 (34%) patients, with a median cumulative length of 5.0 mm. In 46%, the Grade Group at the margin was equal to the primary tumor grade, while being lower in 42% and higher in 12%. In multivariable analysis, Grade Group at the margin outperformed the Grade Group of the primary tumor in predicting BCRFS. Among primary Grade Group 2 patients, 56% had Grade Group 1 disease at the margin. Multivariable analysis identified cumulative length, Grade Group at the margin, and lymph node metastasis as independent predictors for BCRFS, while percentage Gleason pattern 4, tertiary Gleason pattern 5 of the primary tumor, and cribriform architecture at the margin were not. In conclusion, the Grade Group at the positive surgical margin was dissimilar to the primary tumor grade in 54% and better predicted BCRFS than the primary tumor grade. Cumulative length and tumor grade at the margin were independent predictors for BCRFS, whereas cribriform architecture at the margin was not.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Clinical significance of surgical margin status in patients subjected to radical prostatectomy [J].
Dobruch, Jakub ;
Nyk, Lukasz ;
Skrzypczyk, Michal ;
Chlosta, Piotr ;
Dzik, Tomasz ;
Borowka, Andrzej .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 65 (04) :195-199
[12]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[13]   Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Humphreys, EB ;
Mangold, LA ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :433-439
[14]   Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Piantadosi, S ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :416-419
[15]   Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy - The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Pound, CR ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :555-+
[16]   Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy [J].
Hashimoto, Kohei ;
Masumori, Naoya ;
Takei, Fumiyasu ;
Fukuta, Fumimasa ;
Takahashi, Atsushi ;
Itoh, Naoki ;
Hasegawa, Tadashi ;
Tsukamoto, Taiji .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 38 (01) :31-35
[17]   Recommendations for Post-Prostatectomy Radiation Therapy in the United States Before and After the Presentation of Randomized Trials [J].
Hoffman, Karen E. ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Chen, Ming-Hui ;
Chen, Ronald C. ;
Choueiri, Toni K. ;
Hu, Jim C. ;
Kuban, Deborah A. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (01) :116-120
[18]   Digital Quantification of Five High-Grade Prostate Cancer Patterns, Including the Cribriform Pattern, and Their Association With Adverse Outcome [J].
Iczkowski, Kenneth A. ;
Torkko, Kathleen C. ;
Kotnis, Gregory R. ;
Wilson, R. Storey ;
Huang, Wei ;
Wheeler, Thomas M. ;
Abeyta, Andrea M. ;
La Rosa, Francisco G. ;
Cook, Shelly ;
Werahera, Priya N. ;
Lucia, M. Scott .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 136 (01) :98-107
[19]   Prostate Cancer That Is Within 0.1 mm of the Surgical Margin of a Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Greater Likelihood of Recurrence [J].
Izard, Jason P. ;
True, Lawrence D. ;
May, Philip ;
Ellis, William J. ;
Lange, Paul H. ;
Dalkin, Bruce ;
Lin, Daniel W. ;
Schmidt, Rodney A. ;
Wright, Jonathan L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (03) :333-338
[20]   Low Rates of Adjuvant Radiation in Patients With Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Pathologic Features [J].
Kalbasi, Anusha ;
Swisher-McClure, Samuel ;
Mitra, Nandita ;
Sunderland, Robert ;
Smaldone, Marc C. ;
Uzzo, Robert G. ;
Bekelman, Justin E. .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (19) :3089-3096