Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

被引:29
作者
Hollemans, Eva [1 ]
Verhoef, Esther I. [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [2 ]
Rietbergen, John [3 ]
Helleman, Jozien [2 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [2 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate carcinoma; radical prostatectomy; positive surgical margin; cribriform; biochemical recurrence; GLEASON SCORE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CANCER; RISK; SURVIVAL; TUMOR; PATTERNS; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0000000000001384
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Postoperative biochemical recurrence occurs in up to 40% of prostate carcinoma patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Primary tumor grade and cribriform architecture are important parameters for clinical outcome; however, their relevance at positive surgical margins has not been completely elucidated yet. We reviewed 835 radical prostatectomy specimens and recorded pT-stage, surgical margin status, Grade Group, and cribriform architecture of the primary tumor and at positive surgical margins. Clinicopathologic parameters and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) were used as endpoints. Positive surgical margins were present in 284 (34%) patients, with a median cumulative length of 5.0 mm. In 46%, the Grade Group at the margin was equal to the primary tumor grade, while being lower in 42% and higher in 12%. In multivariable analysis, Grade Group at the margin outperformed the Grade Group of the primary tumor in predicting BCRFS. Among primary Grade Group 2 patients, 56% had Grade Group 1 disease at the margin. Multivariable analysis identified cumulative length, Grade Group at the margin, and lymph node metastasis as independent predictors for BCRFS, while percentage Gleason pattern 4, tertiary Gleason pattern 5 of the primary tumor, and cribriform architecture at the margin were not. In conclusion, the Grade Group at the positive surgical margin was dissimilar to the primary tumor grade in 54% and better predicted BCRFS than the primary tumor grade. Cumulative length and tumor grade at the margin were independent predictors for BCRFS, whereas cribriform architecture at the margin was not.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Does nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy increase the risk of positive surgical margins and biochemical progression? [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan Saud ;
Alibhai, Shabbir M. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Fleshner, Neil E. ;
Jewett, Michael A. ;
Zlotta, Alexandre R. ;
Trachtenberg, John .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2010, 2 (02) :58-62
[2]   Long-term Follow-up of a Matched Cohort Study Evaluating the Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Organ-confined Prostate Cancer With a Positive Surgical Margin [J].
Bhindi, Bimal ;
Carlson, Rachel E. ;
Mason, Ross J. ;
Schulte, Phillip J. ;
Gettman, Matthew T. ;
Frank, Igor ;
Tollefson, Matthew K. ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey .
UROLOGY, 2017, 109 :145-151
[3]   Quality of life after brachytherapy or bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Davis, John W. ;
Frank, Steven J. ;
Kim, Jeri ;
Pettaway, Curtis A. ;
Pugh, Thomas J. ;
Pisters, Louis L. ;
Ward, John F. ;
Choi, Seungtaek ;
Chapin, Brian F. ;
Hoffman, Karen ;
Navai, Neema ;
Achim, Mary ;
McGuire, Sean E. ;
Matin, Surena F. ;
Quynh Nguyen ;
Mahmood, Usama ;
Graber, William J. ;
Chen, Hsiang-Chun ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Kuban, Deborah A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (04) :540-548
[4]  
Brimo F, 2010, UROLOGY, V76, P1206, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.090
[5]   Prostate Cancer - Major Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual [J].
Buyyounouski, Mark K. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
McKenney, Jesse K. ;
Sartor, Oliver ;
Sandler, Howard M. ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Lin, Daniel W. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (03) :246-253
[6]   Ability of Linear Length of Positive Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens to Predict Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Cao, Dengfeng ;
Humphrey, Peter A. ;
Gao, Feng ;
Tao, Yu ;
Kibel, Adam S. .
UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (06) :1409-1414
[7]   The Gleason Score of Tumor at the Margin in Radical Prostatectomy is Predictive of Biochemical Recurrence [J].
Cao, Dengfeng ;
Kibel, Adam S. ;
Gao, Feng ;
Tao, Yu ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (07) :994-1001
[8]   Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality [J].
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Dinizo, Michael ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Han, Misop .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1684-1689
[9]   Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer [J].
Chapin, Brian F. ;
Nguyen, Jenny N. ;
Achim, Mary F. ;
Navai, Neema ;
Williams, Stephen B. ;
Prokhorova, Ina N. ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Tapia, Elsa M. Li Ning ;
Davis, John W. ;
Troncoso, Patricia .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (02) :221-227
[10]   Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Choy, Bonnie ;
Pearce, Shane M. ;
Anderson, Blake B. ;
Shalhav, Arieh L. ;
Zagaja, Gregory ;
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Paner, Gladell P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (10) :1400-1406