Incorporating Social Diversity into Wildfire Management: Proposing "Pathways" for Fire Adaptation

被引:61
作者
Paveglio, Travis B. [1 ]
Carroll, Matthew S. [2 ]
Stasiewicz, Amanda M. [1 ]
Williams, Daniel R. [3 ]
Becker, Dennis R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Nat Resources & Soc, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Sch Environm, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Policy Anal Grp, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
wildfire; social diversity; Wildland Urban Interface; adaptive capacity; comanagement; WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; RISK MITIGATION; UNITED-STATES; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SCIENCE RESEARCH; GREAT-BASIN; OREGON USA;
D O I
10.1093/forsci/fxy005
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Existing research suggests that adoption or development of various wildfire management strategies may differ across communities. However, there have been few attempts to design diverse strategies for local populations to better "live with fire." This article extends an existing approach by articulating how characteristic patterns of local social context might be used to generate a range of fire adaptation "pathways" that can be applied variably across communities. Each 'pathway' would specify a distinct combination of actions, potential policies and incentives that best reflect the social dynamics, ecological stressors, and accepted institutional functions that people in diverse communities are likely to enact. We synthesize existing research to propose broad considerations that would form the basis for diverse pathways. We then use existing research and the aforementioned considerations to propose specific components of pathways for two example community 'archetypes.' We contend that advancement of the conceptual tools introduced in this article can aid communities in the development of flexible, scenario-based approaches for addressing wildfire adaptation in different situations. Processes outlined in the article also serve as a unifying way to document, test, and advance flexible approaches professionals can use to work with local populations in the co-development of wildfire management strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 532
页数:18
相关论文
共 175 条
  • [1] Re-envisioning community-wildfire relations in the US West as adaptive governance
    Abrams, Jesse B.
    Knapp, Melanie
    Paveglio, Travis B.
    Ellison, Autumn
    Moseley, Cassandra
    Nielsen-Pincus, Max
    Carroll, Matthew S.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (03):
  • [2] Network analysis of wildfire transmission and implications for risk governance
    Ager, Alan A.
    Evers, Cody R.
    Day, Michelle A.
    Preisler, Haiganoush K.
    Barros, Ana M. G.
    Nielsen-Pincus, Max
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [3] Coupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planning
    Ager, Alan A.
    Kline, Jeffrey D.
    Fischer, A. Paige
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (08) : 1393 - 1406
  • [4] Factors related to building loss due to wildfires in the conterminous United States
    Alexandre, Patricia M.
    Stewart, Susan I.
    Keuler, Nicholas S.
    Clayton, Murray K.
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Bar-Massada, Avi
    Syphard, Alexandra D.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (07) : 2323 - 2338
  • [5] In the heat of the moment: A local narrative of the responses to a fire in Laerdal, Norway
    Andresen, Silje Aurora
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2017, 21 : 27 - 34
  • [6] [Anonymous], 103017 JFSP
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1959, CONSERVATION GOSPEL
  • [8] [Anonymous], NRS152 USDA FOR SERV
  • [9] [Anonymous], PHILOS T ROYAL SOC B
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, INT J SOCIOLOGICAL S