The writhe of helical structures in the solar corona

被引:107
作者
Torok, T. [1 ,2 ]
Berger, M. A. [2 ,3 ]
Kliem, B. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, UPMC, CNRS, LESIA,Observ Paris, F-92190 Meudon, France
[2] Univ Coll London, Mullard Space Sci Lab, Dorking RH5 6NT, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Exeter, SECAM, Exeter EX4 4QE, Devon, England
[4] Univ Potsdam, Inst Phys & Astron, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
[5] USN, Res Lab, Div Space Sci, Washington, DC 20375 USA
关键词
magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); Sun: corona; Sun:; filaments; prominences; Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs); MASS EJECTIONS; MAGNETIC CONFIGURATIONS; KINK INSTABILITY; ACTIVE REGIONS; FLUX ROPES; OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE; ERUPTIVE PROMINENCE; FILAMENT; EVOLUTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/200913578
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Helicity is a fundamental property of magnetic fields, conserved in ideal MHD. In flux rope geometry, it consists of twist and writhe helicity. Despite the common occurrence of helical structures in the solar atmosphere, little is known about how their shape relates to the writhe, which fraction of helicity is contained in writhe, and how much helicity is exchanged between twist and writhe when they erupt. Aims. Here we perform a quantitative investigation of these questions relevant for coronal flux ropes. Methods. The decomposition of the writhe of a curve into local and nonlocal components greatly facilitates its computation. We use it to study the relation between writhe and projected S shape of helical curves and to measure writhe and twist in numerical simulations of flux rope instabilities. The results are discussed with regard to filament eruptions and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Results. (1) We demonstrate that the relation between writhe and projected S shape is not unique in principle, but that the ambiguity does not affect low-lying structures, thus supporting the established empirical rule which associates stable forward (reverse) S shaped structures low in the corona with positive (negative) helicity. (2) Kink-unstable erupting flux ropes are found to transform a far smaller fraction of their twist helicity into writhe helicity than often assumed. (3) Confined flux rope eruptions tend to show stronger writhe at low heights than ejective eruptions (CMEs). This argues against suggestions that the writhing facilitates the rise of the rope through the overlying field. (4) Erupting filaments which are S shaped already before the eruption and keep the sign of their axis writhe (which is expected if field of one chirality dominates the source volume of the eruption), must reverse their S shape in the course of the rise. Implications for the occurrence of the helical kink instability in such events are discussed. (5) The writhe of rising loops can easily be estimated from the angle of rotation about the direction of ascent, once the apex height exceeds the footpoint separation significantly. Conclusions. Writhe can straightforwardly be computed for numerical data and can often be estimated from observations. It is useful in interpreting S shaped coronal structures and in constraining models of eruptions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   FORMULAS FOR THE CALCULATION AND ESTIMATION OF WRITHE [J].
ALDINGER, J ;
KLAPPER, I ;
TABOR, M .
JOURNAL OF KNOT THEORY AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS, 1995, 4 (03) :343-372
[2]   A twisted flux rope model for coronal mass ejections and two-ribbon flares [J].
Amari, T ;
Luciani, JF ;
Mikic, Z ;
Linker, J .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 529 (01) :L49-L52
[3]   A model for solar coronal mass ejections [J].
Antiochos, SK ;
DeVore, CR ;
Klimchuk, JA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 510 (01) :485-493
[4]   Three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamical simulation of expanding magnetic flux ropes [J].
Arnold, L. ;
Dreher, J. ;
Grauer, R. ;
Soltwisch, H. ;
Stein, H. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2008, 15 (04)
[5]   Writhe in the stretch-twist-fold dynamo [J].
Asgari-Targhi, Mahboubeh ;
Berger, Mitchell A. .
GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2009, 103 (01) :69-87
[6]  
Aulanier G, 1998, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V329, P1125
[7]  
Bateman G., 1978, MHD Instabilities
[8]   Laboratory simulations of solar prominence eruptions [J].
Bellan, PM ;
Hansen, JF .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1998, 5 (05) :1991-2000
[9]   THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY [J].
BERGER, MA ;
FIELD, GB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) :133-148
[10]   RIGOROUS NEW LIMITS ON MAGNETIC HELICITY DISSIPATION IN THE SOLAR CORONA [J].
BERGER, MA .
GEOPHYSICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 1984, 30 (1-2) :79-104