Investigating the Factor Structure of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in Community and Clinical Samples of the Australian Population

被引:64
作者
Sunderland, Matthew [1 ,3 ]
Mahoney, Alison [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andrews, Gavin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Clin Res Unit Anxiety & Depress CRUfAD, OBrien Ctr, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Psychological distress; K10; K6; Factor analysis; Construct validity; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; K10 SCREENING SCALES; MENTAL-HEALTH; FIT INDEXES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; CIDI-AUTO; ANXIETY; VERSION; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-012-9276-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Kessler 10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a brief dimensional scale designed to measure and monitor trends of psychological distress. Recently the scale has been utilised by general practitioners and clinicians to screen for common mental disorders and measure treatment outcomes. Despite the K10 demonstrating a sound one dimensional structure in the general population, the scale's structure has yet to be comprehensively tested in clinical samples. The current study aimed to use confirmatory factor analysis to test three theoretical structure models of the K10 and one model for the K6 (a six item variant) in a sample from a tertiary referral clinic for mood and anxiety disorders and compare those results with a population sample from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. The results demonstrated that a two factor model with correlated latent factors representing depression and anxiety fit the clinical sample the best whilst a one factor model with correlated errors between several items fit the population sample the best. The results are discussed further in relation to scoring and interpreting the Kessler scales.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 259
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The psychometric properties of the composite international diagnostic interview [J].
Andrews, G ;
Peters, L .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) :80-88
[2]   Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) [J].
Andrews, G ;
Slade, T .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (06) :494-497
[3]   Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation - Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey [J].
Andrews, G ;
Henderson, S ;
Hall, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :145-153
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[6]   The Factor Structure of the Kessler-10 Questionnaire in a Treatment-Seeking Sample [J].
Berle, David ;
Starcevic, Vladan ;
Milicevic, Denise ;
Moses, Karen ;
Hannan, Anthony ;
Sammut, Peter ;
Brakoulias, Vlasios .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2010, 198 (09) :660-664
[7]   Factor structure and interpretation of the K10 [J].
Brooks, RT ;
Beard, J ;
Steel, Z .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (01) :62-70
[8]   When fit indices and residuals are incompatible [J].
Browne, MW ;
MacCallum, RC ;
Kim, CT ;
Andersen, BL ;
Glaser, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :403-421
[9]   The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders [J].
Donker, Tara ;
Comijs, Hannie ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Terluin, Berend ;
Nolen, Willem ;
Zitman, Frans ;
Penninx, Brenda .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2010, 176 (01) :45-50
[10]   Psychometric properties of an interviewer-administered version of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) among Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish respondents [J].
Fassaert, T. ;
de Wit, M. A. S. ;
Tuinebreijer, W. C. ;
Wouters, H. ;
Verhoeff, A. P. ;
Beekman, A. T. F. ;
Dekker, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (03) :159-168