Incorporating Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Into Usual Care Reduces Acute Migraine Medication Use: An Open-Label Extension Study

被引:15
|
作者
Marmura, Michael J. [1 ]
Lin, Tamar [2 ]
Harris, Dagan [2 ]
Ironi, Alon [2 ]
Rosen, Noah L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Headache Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Theran Bioelect Ltd, Netanya, Israel
[3] Northwell Hlth, Great Neck, NY USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
remote electrical neuromodulation; migraine; medication overuse headache; conditioned pain modulation; neuromodulation; acute treatment; OVERUSE HEADACHE; PARALLEL-GROUP; RISK-FACTORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2020.00226
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A recent randomized controlled study showed that 66.7% (66/99) and 37.4% (37/99) of people undergoing remote electrical neuromodulation (REN), a novel non-pharmacological migraine treatment, achieve pain relief and pain freedom, respectively, at 2 h post-treatment. The participants who completed the 6-weeks double-blind phase of this study were offered to participate in an open-label extension (OLE) with an active REN device. Objective: This study investigated the clinical use of REN, focusing on its potential in reducing the use of acute migraine medications. Methods: The parent study for this open-label extension (OLE) was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of acute treatment conducted on 296 participants enrolled at 12 sites in the USA and Israel. This study included a run-in phase, in which migraine attacks were treated with usual care, and an 8-weeks double-blind treatment phase. One hundred sixty participants continued in an 8-weeks OLE phase in which they could incorporate a REN device into their usual care. Medication use rate (percentage of participants who treated their attacks only with REN and avoided medications in all their attacks) and pain outcomes at 2 h post-treatment were compared between the OLE and the run-in phase in a within-subject design. Results: The analyses were performed on 117 participants with episodic migraine. During the OLE, 89.7% of the participants treated their attacks only with REN and avoided medications in all their attacks compared with 15.4% in the run-in phase (p < 0.0001). The rates of pain relief and pain-free in at least 50% of the treatments at 2 h post-treatment were comparable (pain relief: 58.1% in the run-in phase and 57.3% in the OLE, p = 0.999; pain-free: 23.1% in the run-in vs. 30.8% in the OLE, p = 0.175). Conclusions: REN may reduce the use of acute migraine medications. Thus, incorporating REN into usual care may reduce the risk for medication overuse headache (MOH). Future studies should evaluate whether REN reduces the use of acute migraine medications in a population at risk for MOH.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Almotriptan in the acute treatment of migraine in patients 11-17 years old: An open-label pilot study of efficacy and safety
    Charles J.A.
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2006, 7 (2) : 95 - 97
  • [32] Long-term safety of zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 2/3 open-label study
    Mullin, Kathleen
    Croop, Robert
    Mosher, Linda
    Fullerton, Terence
    Madonia, Jennifer
    Lipton, Richard B.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2024, 44 (08)
  • [33] Long-term safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine: Results from a 52-week, open-label extension study
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Ashina, Messoud
    Reuter, Uwe
    Brandes, Jan Lewis
    Dolezil, David
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Winner, Paul
    Zhang, Feng
    Cheng, Sunfa
    Mikol, Daniel D.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2020, 40 (06) : 543 - 553
  • [34] An open-label study to assess changes in efficacy and satisfaction with migraine care when patients have access to multiple sumatriptan succinate formulations
    Weidmann, E
    Unger, J
    Blair, S
    Friesen, C
    Hart, C
    Cady, R
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (01) : 235 - 246
  • [35] Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium combination versus its components administered concomitantly for the acute treatment of migraine: a pragmatic, crossover, open-label outcomes study
    Landy, Stephen
    Hoagland, Rebecca
    Hoagland, Dakota
    Saiers, Jane
    Reuss, Gena
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, 2013, 6 (05) : 279 - 286
  • [36] Clinical Evaluation After Discontinuation of Galcanezumab in Japanese Patients with Episodic and Chronic Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial and Open-label Extension Study
    Takeshima, Takao
    Doi, Hikaru
    Ooba, Satomi
    Tanji, Yuka
    Ozeki, Akichika
    Komori, Mika
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (03) : 697 - 714
  • [37] Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study)
    Brandes, Jan Lewis
    Klise, Suzanne
    Krege, John H.
    Case, Michael
    Khanna, Rashna
    Vasudeva, Raghavendra
    Raskin, Joel
    Pearlman, Eric M.
    Kudrow, David
    CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 (11) : 1343 - 1357
  • [38] Effectiveness of Lurasidone for Patients With Schizophrenia Following 6 Weeks of Acute Treatment With Lurasidone, Olanzapine, or Placebo: A 6-Month, Open-Label, Extension Study
    Stahl, Stephen M.
    Cucchiaro, Josephine
    Simonelli, Doreen
    Hsu, Jay
    Pikalov, Andrei
    Loebel, Antony
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 74 (05) : 507 - 515
  • [39] Long-term efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation for treatment of medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: A 24-Week Open-Label Extension Study
    Roy, Asim
    Ojile, Joseph
    Kram, Jerrold
    Olin, Jonathan
    Rosenberg, Russell
    Hudson, J. Douglas
    Bogan, Richard K.
    Charlesworth, Jonathan D.
    SLEEP, 2023, 46 (10)
  • [40] Rizatriptan 5 mg for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: Results from a double-blind, single-attack study and two open-label, multiple-attack studies
    Visser, WH
    Winner, P
    Strohmaier, K
    Klipfel, M
    Peng, Y
    McCarroll, K
    Cady, R
    Lewis, D
    Nett, R
    HEADACHE, 2004, 44 (09): : 891 - 899