What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study

被引:15
作者
Bharadwaj, Preeti [1 ]
Saxton, Jennifer C. [2 ]
Mann, Susan N.
Jungmann, Eva M. A. [3 ]
Stephenson, Judith M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Margaret Pyke Ctr Study & Training Family Planning, London W1T 4PL, England
[2] UCL, Inst Child Hlth, London, England
[3] Camden Provider Serv, London, England
[4] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Emergency contraception; Intrauterine device; Emergency contraceptive pill; SEEKING ABORTION; ADOLESCENT; KNOWLEDGE; SHANGHAI;
D O I
10.3109/13625187.2011.565891
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To explore key factors influencing young women when choosing between two methods of emergency contraception (EC). Methods We interviewed 26 young women who accessed community sexual and reproductive health services for emergency contraception after they had chosen an EC. Results Most women had an unrealistically high expectation about efficacy of the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) and lacked knowledge of the intrauterine device (IUD) as an alternative method of EC. Previous use, easy accessibility, ease of use, and advice from peers, influenced women to choose the ECP, whereas past experience of abortion, firm motivation to avoid pregnancy, presentation after 72 hours, and considering that an IUD may provide long-term contraception as well, inclined women to choose the IUD. When participants were shown the IUD, many found it to be smaller and less frightening than they had imagined. Conclusions Women need better information and education about the IUD as a highly effective method of EC. Health professionals must provide such information at every opportunity. Showing the IUD during counselling might help correct misconceptions and would improve acceptability. Wider availability of expertise concerning EC-IUDs is essential to assist more women in making informed decisions when choosing a method for EC.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LONG ACT REV CONTR E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, V32, P121
[3]   What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study [J].
Asker, C ;
Stokes-Lampard, H ;
Beavan, J ;
Wilson, S .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2006, 32 (02) :89-94
[4]   Is the Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Guidance on emergency contraception being followed in general practice? An audit in the West Midlands, UK [J].
Bannister, Lisa ;
Macve, Joanna ;
Pinkey, Benjamin ;
Webberley, Helen .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2007, 33 (03) :195-198
[5]   Reasons for requesting emergency contraception: A survey of 506 Italian women [J].
Bastianelli, C ;
Farris, M ;
Benagiano, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2005, 10 (03) :157-163
[6]   Why don't teenagers use contraception? A qualitative interview study [J].
Brown, Sally ;
Guthrie, Kate .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2010, 15 (03) :197-204
[7]  
Cheng L, 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub4]
[8]   Accessing emergency contraception: the role of friends in the adolescent experience [J].
Fallon, Debbie .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2010, 32 (05) :677-694
[9]   Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis [J].
Glasier, Anna F. ;
Cameron, Sharon T. ;
Fine, Paul M. ;
Logan, Susan J. S. ;
Casale, William ;
Van Horn, Jennifer ;
Sogor, Laszlo ;
Blithe, Diana L. ;
Scherrer, Bruno ;
Mathe, Henri ;
Jaspart, Amelie ;
Ulmann, Andre ;
Gainer, Erin .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9714) :555-562
[10]  
LADER D, 2008, 41 OFF NAT STAT DEP, P41