The Great Internet TCP Congestion Control Census

被引:44
|
作者
Mishra, Ayush [1 ]
Sun, Xiangpeng [1 ]
Jain, Atishya [2 ]
Pande, Sameer [2 ]
Joshi, Raj [1 ]
Leong, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Delhi, India
关键词
congestion control; measurement study; HIGH-SPEED; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1145/3366693
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In 2016, Google proposed and deployed a new TCP variant called BBR. BBR represents a major departure from traditional congestion-window-based congestion control. Instead of using loss as a congestion signal, BBR uses estimates of the bandwidth and round-trip delays to regulate its sending rate. The last major study on the distribution of TCP variants on the Internet was done in 2011, so it is timely to conduct a new census given the recent developments around BBR. To this end, we designed and implemented Gordon, a tool that allows us to measure the exact congestion window (cwnd) corresponding to each successive RTT in the TCP connection response of a congestion control algorithm. To compare a measured flow to the known variants, we created a localized bottleneck where we can introduce a variety of network changes like loss events, bandwidth change, and increased delay, and normalize all measurements by RTT. An offline classifier is used to identify the TCP variant based on the cwnd trace over time. Our results suggest that CUBIC is currently the dominant TCP variant on the Internet, and it is deployed on about 36% of the websites in the Alexa Top 20,000 list. While BBR and its variant BBR G1.1 are currently in second place with a 22% share by website count, their present share of total Internet traffic volume is estimated to be larger than 40%. We also found that Akamai has deployed a unique loss-agnostic rate-based TCP variant on some 6% of the Alexa Top 20,000 websites and there are likely other undocumented variants. The traditional assumption that TCP variants "in the wild" will come from a small known set is not likely to be true anymore. We predict that some variant of BBR seems poised to replace CUBIC as the next dominant TCP variant on the Internet.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evolution of congestion control algorithms in the different variants of the TCP protocol
    Cadin, Vanesa G.
    Talay, Carlos A.
    INFORMES CIENTIFICOS Y TECNICOS, 2021, 13 (01): : 125 - 144
  • [22] On Minimizing TCP Traffic Congestion in Vehicular Internet of Things (VIoT)
    Jude, M. Joseph Auxilius
    Diniesh, V. C.
    Shivaranjani, M.
    Muthusamy, Suresh
    Panchal, Hitesh
    Sundararajan, Suma Christal Mary
    Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 128 (03) : 1873 - 1893
  • [23] Congestion Control for Internet of Things Based on Priority
    Ma, Lujuan
    Liu, Xiaoping
    Wang, Huanqing
    Zhou, Yucheng
    Deng, Xiaoping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (04) : 1154 - 1165
  • [24] Congestion control for sudden bandwidth changes in TCP
    Ko, Euiyul
    An, Donghyeok
    Yeom, Ikjun
    Yoon, Hyunsoo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 25 (12) : 1550 - 1567
  • [25] Analysis of scalable TCP congestion control algorithm
    El Khoury, R.
    Altman, E.
    El Azouzi, R.
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 33 : S41 - S49
  • [26] Low Priority Congestion Control for Multipath TCP
    Zhang, Yuan
    Li, Jian
    Yang, Jiayu
    Xing, Yitao
    Zhuang, Rui
    Xue, Kaiping
    2021 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2021,
  • [27] Internet Congestion Control System
    Rusmin, Pranoto Hidaya
    Machbub, Carmadi
    Harsoyo, Agung
    Hendrawan, Dan
    MAKARA JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 12 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [28] Reproducible measurements of TCP BBR congestion control
    Jaeger, Benedikt
    Scholz, Dominik
    Raumer, Daniel
    Geyer, Fabien
    Carle, Georg
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 144 : 31 - 43
  • [29] Host-to-Host Congestion Control for TCP
    Afanasyev, Alexander
    Tilley, Neil
    Reiher, Peter
    Kleinrock, Leonard
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2010, 12 (03): : 304 - 342
  • [30] Congestion control for mixed TCP and UDP traffic
    Chae, HS
    Choi, MR
    Cho, TK
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, E88B (10) : 4097 - 4101