Sexual and/or gender minority disparities in obstetrical and birth outcomes

被引:20
作者
Leonard, Stephanie A. [1 ,2 ]
Berrahou, Iman [3 ]
Zhang, Adary [4 ]
Monseur, Brent [1 ]
Main, Elliott K. [1 ,2 ]
Obedin-Maliver, Juno [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Calif Maternal Qual Care Collaborat, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; birth certificates; bisexual; gay; health disparities; healthcare disparities; lesbian; maternal mortality; multiple pregnancy; pregnancy; pregnancy-induced hypertension; severe maternal morbidity; sexual and gender minorities; transgender; TRANSGENDER MEN; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.041
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Many sexual and/or gender minority individuals build families through pregnancy and childbirth, but it is unknown whether they experience different clinical outcomes than those who are not sexual and/ or gender minority individuals. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate obstetrical and birth outcomes comparing couples who are likely sexual and/or gender minority patients compared with those who are not likely to be sexual and/or gender minority patients. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a population-based cohort study of live birth hospitalizations during 2016 to 2019 linked to birth certificates in California. California changed its birth certificate in 2016 to include gender-neutral fields such as "parent giving birth" and "parent not giving birth," with options for each role to specify "mother," "father," or "parent." We classified birthing patients in mother-mother partnerships and those who identified as a father in any partnership as likely sexual and/or gender minority and classified birthing patients in mother-father partnerships as likely not sexual and/or gender minority. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to estimate the risk ratios for associations between likely sexual and/or gender minority parental structures and outcomes. The models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and multifetal gestation selected by causal diagrams. We replicated the analyses after excluding multifetal gestations. RESULTS: In the final birthing patient sample, 1,483,119 were mothers with father partners, 2572 were mothers with mother partners, and 498 were fathers with any partner. Compared with birthing patients in mother-father partnerships, birthing patients in mother-mother partnerships experienced significantly higher rates of multifetal gestation (adjusted risk ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-4.4), labor induction (adjusted risk ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3), postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted risk ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6), severe morbidity (adjusted risk ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.8), and nontransfusion severe morbidity (adjusted risk ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9). Severe morbidity was identified following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "severe maternal morbidity" index. Gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation), low birth-weight (<2500 g), and low Apgar score (<7 at 5 minutes) did not significantly differ in the multivariable analyses. No outcomes significantly differed between father birthing patients in any partnership and birthing patients in mother-father partnerships in either crude or multivariable analyses, though the risk of multifetal gestation was nonsignificantly higher (adjusted risk ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-2.7). The adjusted risk ratios for the outcomes were similar after restriction to singleton gestations. CONCLUSION: Birthing mothers with mother partners experienced disparities in several obstetrical and birth outcomes independent of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and multifetal gestation. Birthing fathers in any partnership were not at a significantly elevated risk of any adverse obstetrical or birth outcome considered in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health, 2021, AIM SMM COD LIST
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, LANCET, V377, P1211, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60482-0
  • [3] Validation of Obstetric Estimate Using Early Ultrasound: 2007 California Birth Certificates
    Barradas, Danielle T.
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    Pearl, Michelle
    England, Lucinda J.
    Callaghan, William M.
    Kharrazi, Martin
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [4] Besse M, 2020, YALE J BIOL MED, V93, P517
  • [5] Assessing and Addressing Cardiovascular Health in LGBTQ Adults A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
    Caceres, Billy A.
    Streed, Carl G., Jr.
    Corliss, Heather L.
    Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
    Matthews, Phoenix A.
    Mukherjee, Monica
    Poteat, Tonia
    Rosendale, Nicole
    Ross, Leanna M.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 142 (19) : E321 - E332
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, US GUID 2019 NAT PUB
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, GUID COMPL FAC WORKS
  • [8] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, SEV MAT MORB US
  • [9] Attitudes Toward Fertility and Reproductive Health Among Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Adolescents
    Chen, Diane
    Matson, Margaret
    Macapagal, Kathryn
    Johnson, Emilie K.
    Rosoklija, Ilina
    Finlayson, Courtney
    Fisher, Celia B.
    Mustanski, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2018, 63 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [10] Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses
    Chih, Hui Ju
    Elias, Flavia T. S.
    Gaudet, Laura
    Velez, Maria P.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)