Drought forecasting by ANN, ANFIS, and SVM and comparison of the models

被引:152
作者
Mokhtarzad, Maryam [1 ]
Eskandari, Farzad [2 ]
Vanjani, Nima Jamshidi [3 ]
Arabasadi, Alireza [4 ]
机构
[1] Kashani Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Qazvin, Iran
[2] Allameh Tabatabaee Univ, Dept Stat, Tehran, Iran
[3] Tabriz Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Artificial neural network; Drought; Standardized precipitation index; Adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system; Support vector machine; Forecasting Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; DRIVEN;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-017-7064-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drought is a natural disaster that causes significant impact on all parts of environment and cause to reduction of the agricultural products. Other natural phenomena, for instance climate change, earthquake, storm, flood, and landslide, are also commonplace. In recent years, various techniques of artificial intelligence are used for drought prediction. The presented paper describes drought forecasting, which makes use of and compares the artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS), and support vector machine (SVM). The index that is used in this study is Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). All of data from Bojnourd meteorological station (from January 1984 to December 2012) have been tested for 3-month time scales. The input parameters are as follows: temperature, humidity, and season precipitation, and the output parameter is SPI. This paper shows high accuracy of these models. The results indicated that the SVM model gives more accurate values for forecasting. On the other hand, we use the nonparametric inference to compare the proposal methods, and our results show that SVM model is more accurate than ANN and ANFIS.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   The Construction of Support Vector Machine Classifier Using the Firefly Algorithm [J].
Chao, Chih-Feng ;
Horng, Ming-Huwi .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 2015
[12]   A Survey of 2D Face Recognition Techniques [J].
Chihaoui, Mejda ;
Elkefi, Akram ;
Bellil, Wajdi ;
Ben Amar, Chokri .
COMPUTERS, 2016, 5 (04)
[13]  
Dai AG, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P52, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1633, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1633]
[14]   Empirical software metrics for benchmarking of verification tools [J].
Demyanova, Yulia ;
Pani, Thomas ;
Veith, Helmut ;
Zuleger, Florian .
FORMAL METHODS IN SYSTEM DESIGN, 2017, 50 (2-3) :289-316
[15]  
Devi C.J., 2012, Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol., V3, P19
[16]  
Folorunsho J. O., 2012, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, V4, P4275
[17]   A framework for mapping tree species combining hyperspectral and LiDAR data: Role of selected classifiers and sensor across three spatial scales [J].
Ghosh, Aniruddha ;
Fassnacht, Fabian Ewald ;
Joshi, P. K. ;
Koch, Barbara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2014, 26 :49-63
[18]   Attribute Selection Impact on Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models for Crop Yield Prediction [J].
Gonzalez-Sanchez, Alberto ;
Frausto-Solis, Juan ;
Ojeda-Bustamante, Waldo .
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
[19]   A Kolmogorov-Smirnov Based Test for Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Two Sets of Forecasts [J].
Hassani, Hossein ;
Silva, Emmanuel Sirimal .
ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 3 (03) :590-609
[20]  
Hosseinpour NH, 2011, WATER WASTEWATER CON, V2, P42