Effect of combining different surface treatments on the surface characteristics of polyetheretherketone-based core materials and shear bond strength to a veneering composite resin

被引:13
作者
Taha, Doaa [1 ,2 ]
Safwat, Farida [2 ]
Wahsh, Marwa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Sect Med Mat Sci & Technol, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Khalifa El Maamon St, Cairo 11566, Egypt
关键词
PEEK; PLASMA; IMPLANTOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. High-performance polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has been used in dentistry because of its excellent physical and chemical properties. However, its lack of translucency requires the use of a veneering composite resin for esthetic applications. Data on bonding a veneering composite resin to PEEK are still scarce. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of using and combining different surface treatments on the surface roughness and wettability of PEEK core materials and the shear bond strength (SBS) to a veneering composite resin. Material and methods. Sixty square PEEK specimens were divided according to surface treatments into 6 groups: group N, no surface treatment; group A, airborne-particle abrasion; group L, ER:YAG laser treatment; group LA, laser treatment and airborne-particle abrasion; group P, plasma treatment; and group PA, plasma treatment and airborne-particle abrasion. Surface roughness (Ra) and wettability (contact angle theta) were measured followed by evaluation of the surface topography. After veneering, the SBS was measured. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess all interactions with multiple pairwise comparisons (alpha=.05). Results. The highest mean Ra values were obtained for the combination treatment groups (LA 2.94 +/- 0.1 and PA 2.7 +/- 0.1 mu m) (P<.001). While the laser (13 +/- 0.1 mu m) and plasma treatment (1.4 +/- 0.1 mu m) groups had the lowest Ra values, LA and PA had the highest wetting of PEEK surfaces (LA 6.9 +/- 0.7 and PA 4.9 +/- 0.2 degrees) (P<.001). The highest mean SBS values were demonstrated on PEEK surfaces with combination treatments (LA 22 +/- 1.3 and PA 21.2 +/- 0.8 MPa) (P<.001). Conclusions. Combining airborne-particle abrasion with laser or plasma treatments increased the surface roughness and wettability of PEEK surfaces favorably compared with applying each of the 3 treatments individually. The combinations enhanced the bond strength of PEEK to the veneering composite resin.
引用
收藏
页码:599.e1 / 599.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone
    Ates, Sabit Melih
    Caglar, Ipek
    Duymus, Zeynep Yesil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (20) : 2220 - 2231
  • [2] Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials
    Boetel, Friederike
    Zimmermann, Tycho
    Suetel, Mona
    Mueller, Wolf-Dieter
    Schwitalla, Andreas Dominik
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2018, 34 (09) : E246 - E254
  • [3] Effect of Various Treatment Modalities on Surface Characteristics and Shear Bond Strengths of Polyetheretherketone-Based Core Materials
    Culhaoglu, Ahmet Kursat
    Ozkir, Serhat Emre
    Sahin, Volkan
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Kilicarslan, Mehmet Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (02): : 136 - 141
  • [4] The effects of surface treatments on tensile bond strength of polyether-ketone-ketone (PEKK) to veneering resin
    Fokas, George
    Guo, Cecilia Yan
    Tsoi, James K. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2019, 93 : 1 - 8
  • [5] The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments
    Hallmann, Lubica
    Mehl, Albert
    Sereno, Nuno
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    [J]. APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2012, 258 (18) : 7213 - 7218
  • [6] Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK)
    Kern, Matthias
    Lehmann, Frank
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2012, 28 (12) : 1280 - 1283
  • [7] Keul C, 2014, J ADHES DENT, V16, P383, DOI [10.3290/jjad.a32570, 10.3290/j.jad.a32570]
  • [8] MRI and dental implantology: Two which do not exclude each other
    Korn, P.
    Elschner, C.
    Schulz, M. C.
    Range, U.
    Mai, R.
    Scheler, U.
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2015, 53 : 634 - 645
  • [9] Kurtz SM., 2012, PEEK BIOMATERIALS HD, P333
  • [10] PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants
    Kurtz, Steven M.
    Devine, John N.
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (32) : 4845 - 4869