Threshold of island anthropogenic disturbance based on ecological vulnerability Assessment-A case study of Zhujiajian Island

被引:29
作者
Xie, Zuolun [1 ]
Li, Xiuzhen [1 ]
Jiang, Degang [2 ]
Lin, Shiwei [1 ]
Yang, Bin [1 ]
Chen, Shenliang [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, State Key Lab Estuarine & Coastal Res, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] State Ocean Adm, Isl Res Ctr, Xiamen 350400, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Island ecological vulnerability; Anthropogenic disturbance; Threshold; Ecosystem management; Zhujiajian island; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; ECOSYSTEM; IMPACT; INDEX; URBANIZATION; EXPANSION; BRIDGE; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.014
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The accessibility of islands can be largely improved with fixed link to the mainland by the construction of sea cross bridges and tunnels, which results in a rapid increase of tourists and economic income. Meanwhile the accelerated increase of built-up land will change the island land use deeply. As the main anthropogenic disturbance, the rapid change of land use and increase of tourists will set further pressure on the ecological vulnerability of islands. It is urgent to derive the threshold of anthropogenic influence on the island with fixed link to the mainland. Island Ecological Vulnerability Index (IEVI) is used to evaluate the ecological vulnerability of Zhujiajian Island. Land use and tourists change in the next 20 years is simulated to estimate the change of island ecological vulnerability. The main results are: 1) The ecosystem of Zhujiajian Island is in good condition now, with limited area at moderate and severe vulnerable status; 2) With the rapid increase of anthropogenic disturbance, the ecological vulnerability of the island tends to increase. During the research period 2015-2035 the area of severe vulnerability increases by 78%, and the area of mild vulnerability increases by 201 ha (33%). One third of the non-vulnerable area becomes vulnerable; 3) Based on the prediction of ecological vulnerability, the threshold of tourists in Zhujiajian Island is about 16 million per year. The upper limit of built up area is 2500 ha, which means 90% is already used. With the improvement of management effectiveness and waste treatment capacity, the island's anthropogenic disturbance threshold can be raised. The vulnerability based anthropogenic disturbance threshold analysis can provide a basis for viable island ecosystem management strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Aljarad S.N., 1995, Journal of Transport Geography, V3, P257, DOI DOI 10.1016/0966-6923(95)00025-9
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, GLOB ENV CHANGE PART, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00018-3
  • [3] [Anonymous], ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORES, DOI [10.2737/RM-GTR-246, DOI 10.2737/RM-GTR-246]
  • [4] Climax vegetation in tropical America
    Beard, JS
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1944, 25 (02) : 127 - 158
  • [5] Berkes F, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1251, DOI 10.2307/2641280
  • [6] Ecological vulnerability indicators
    Beroya-Eitner, Mary Antonette
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 : 329 - 334
  • [7] Resilientscapes: perception and resilience to reduce vulnerability in the island of Madeira
    Bonati, Sara
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING RESILIENCE, INCORPORATING THE 3RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE ANDROID DISASTER RESILIENCE NETWORK, 2014, 18 : 513 - 520
  • [8] Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China
    Cao, Wenting
    Li, Rui
    Chi, Xiaoli
    Chen, Ninghua
    Chen, Jianyu
    Zhang, Huaguo
    Zhang, Feng
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 76 : 1 - 14
  • [9] Evaluation on island ecological vulnerability and its spatial heterogeneity
    Chi, Yuan
    Shi, Honghua
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Guo, Zhen
    Wang, Enkang
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2017, 125 (1-2) : 216 - 241
  • [10] Local contention, global framing: The protest campaigns against the TAV in Val di Susa and the bridge on the Messina Straits
    della Porta, Donatella
    Piazza, Gianni
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2007, 16 (05) : 864 - 882