Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

被引:5
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biomed, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COIL ORIENTATION; BRAIN INHIBITION; SURFACE EMG; CORTEX; PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late Iwave circuits. 22 young adults (22 +/- 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on neuroplasticity in corticomotor pathways of the tongue muscles
    Kothari, M.
    Stubbs, P. W.
    Figlewski, K.
    Pedersen, A. R.
    Jensen, J.
    Baad-Hansen, L.
    Svensson, P.
    Nielsen, J. F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (09) : 691 - 701
  • [42] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Opportunities
    Feng, Wuwei
    Kautz, Steven A.
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Meinzer, Caitlyn
    George, Mark S.
    Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
    PM&R, 2018, 10 (09) : S157 - S164
  • [43] Trains of transcranial direct current stimulation antagonize motor cortex hypoexcitability induced by acute hemicerebellectomy Laboratory investigation
    Taib, Nordeyn Oulad Ben
    Manto, Mario
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 111 (04) : 796 - 806
  • [44] BDNF Val66Met but not transcranial direct current stimulation affects motor learning after stroke
    van der Vliet, Rick
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    Vandermeeren, Yves
    Frens, Maarten A.
    Selles, Ruud W.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (05) : 882 - 892
  • [45] Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Rezaee, Zeynab
    Chang, Dae-In
    Gerwig, Marcus
    Herlitze, Stefan
    Dutta, Anirban
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Timmann, Dagmar
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (05) : 1177 - 1186
  • [46] The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kumari, Nitika
    Taylor, Denise
    Signal, Nada
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [47] Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cerebellar Brain Inhibition as a Function of TMS Coil Orientation
    Steiner, Katharina M.
    Nicksirat, Seyed Ali
    Thieme, Andreas
    Muentefering, Lara
    Ernst, Thomas M.
    Timmann, Dagmar
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [48] Brain transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor excitability in mice
    Cambiaghi, Marco
    Velikova, Svetla
    Gonzalez-Rosa, Javier J.
    Cursi, Marco
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Leocani, Letizia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 31 (04) : 704 - 709
  • [49] Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults
    Hardwick, Robert M.
    Celnik, Pablo A.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2014, 35 (10) : 2217 - 2221
  • [50] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reconfigures Brain Networks Involved in Motor Execution and Mental Imagery
    Grami, F.
    de Marco, G.
    Bodranghien, F.
    Manto, M.
    Habas, C.
    CEREBELLUM, 2022, 21 (04) : 665 - 680