Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

被引:5
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biomed, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COIL ORIENTATION; BRAIN INHIBITION; SURFACE EMG; CORTEX; PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late Iwave circuits. 22 young adults (22 +/- 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of spinal motor neurons and vestibulospinal tract in healthy individuals
    Sato, Yuki
    Terasawa, Yuta
    Okada, Yohei
    Hasui, Naruhito
    Mizuta, Naomichi
    Ohnishi, Sora
    Fujita, Daiki
    Morioka, Shu
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 242 (10) : 2381 - 2390
  • [32] Timing-Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Hand Motor Function in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Jo, Nam-Gyu
    Kim, Gi-Wook
    Won, Yu Hui
    Park, Sung-Hee
    Seo, Jeong-Hwan
    Ko, Myoung-Hwan
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (10)
  • [33] Modulation of Cortical Inhibitory Circuits after Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex
    Sasaki, Ryoki
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Kotan, Shinichi
    Kojima, Sho
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    Onishi, Hideaki
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [34] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Saccade Adaptation
    Avila, Eric
    van der Geest, Jos N.
    Kamga, Sandra Kengne
    Verhage, M. Claire
    Donchin, Opher
    Frens, Maarten A.
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2015, 2015
  • [35] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals
    Foerster, Aguida
    Dutta, Anirban
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 47 (07) : 779 - 789
  • [36] Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive stage of sequence learning
    Ballard, Hannah K.
    Goen, James R. M.
    Maldonado, Ted
    Bernard, Jessica A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 122 (02) : 490 - 499
  • [37] Enhancing Motor Performance by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Kim, Deog Young
    Ohn, Suk Hoon
    Yang, Eun Joo
    Park, Chang-Il
    Jung, Kang Jae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2009, 88 (10) : 829 - 836
  • [38] Polarity-specific transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts auditory pitch learning
    Matsushita, Reiko
    Andoh, Jamila
    Zatorre, Robert J.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9 : 174
  • [39] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhanced Motor Learning on Robotic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Maps in Children
    Giuffre, Adrianna
    Zewdie, Ephrem
    Wrightson, James G.
    Cole, Lauran
    Carlson, Helen L.
    Kuo, Hsing-Ching
    Babwani, Ali
    Kirton, Adam
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [40] Online and offline effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy older adults: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study
    Samaei, Afshin
    Ehsani, Fatemeh
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Yosephi, Mohaddese Hafez
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 45 (09) : 1177 - 1185