Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits

被引:5
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Biomed, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
PAIRED-PULSE TMS; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COIL ORIENTATION; BRAIN INHIBITION; SURFACE EMG; CORTEX; PLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271311
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late Iwave circuits. 22 young adults (22 +/- 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCS(CB)). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS(1.5)), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS(4.5)), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMS(Sham)). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions could indicate a selective effect of CB on AP-sensitive circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation (tcDCS): Motor control, cognition, learning and emotions
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    Priori, Alberto
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 85 : 918 - 923
  • [22] Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques
    Herzog, Rebecca
    Berger, Till M.
    Pauly, Martje G.
    Xue, Honghu
    Rueckert, Elmar
    Muenchau, Alexander
    Baeumer, Tobias
    Weissbach, Anne
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [23] Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation
    Reis, Janine
    Fritsch, Brita
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2011, 24 (06) : 590 - 596
  • [24] Polarizing cerebellar neurons with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Rahman, Asif
    Toshev, Peter K.
    Bikson, Marom
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 125 (03) : 435 - 438
  • [25] Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease
    de Albuquerque, Lidio Lima
    Pantovic, Milan
    Clingo, Mitchell G.
    Fischer, Katherine M.
    Jalene, Sharon
    Landers, Merrill R.
    Mari, Zoltan
    Poston, Brach
    CEREBELLUM, 2022, 21 (03) : 333 - 349
  • [26] Enhanced Motor Learning Following Task-Concurrent Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Karok, Sophia
    Witney, Alice G.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [27] Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex
    Jefferson, Samantha
    Mistry, Satish
    Singh, Salil
    Rothwell, John
    Hamdy, Shaheen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 297 (06): : G1035 - G1040
  • [28] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Recovery in Patients with Subacute Stroke
    Kim, Dae-Yul
    Lim, Jong-Yub
    Kang, Eun Kyoung
    You, Dae Sang
    Oh, Min-Kyun
    Oh, Byung-Mo
    Paik, Nam-Jong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2010, 89 (11) : 879 - 886
  • [29] Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment
    Eryilmaz, Gul
    Erkmen, Husnu
    Gotgcegtoz Gul, Isil
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (02): : 138 - 142
  • [30] Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to the Right Cerebellar Hemisphere Affects Motor Adaptation During Gait
    Fernandez, Lara
    Albein-Urios, Natalia
    Kirkovski, Melissa
    McGinley, Jennifer L.
    Murphy, Anna T.
    Hyde, Christian
    Stokes, Mark A.
    Rinehart, Nicole J.
    Enticott, Peter G.
    CEREBELLUM, 2017, 16 (01) : 168 - 177