Who Cares and Who Is Careless? Insufficient Effort Responding as a Reflection of Respondent Personality

被引:146
作者
Bowling, Nathan A. [1 ]
Huang, Jason L. [2 ]
Bragg, Caleb B. [3 ]
Khazon, Steve [1 ]
Liu, Mengqiao [1 ]
Blackmore, Caitlin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Psychol, 303C Fawcett Hall,3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Sch Human Resources & Labor Relat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, New Britain, CT USA
关键词
insufficient effort responding; careless responding; response effort; behavioral consistency; personality; BEHAVIORAL CONSISTENCY; VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION; SITUATIONS; RESPONSES; STUDENTS; COLLEGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/pspp0000085
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys, which occurs when respondents fail to carefully read questionnaire instructions or item content, has recently gained attention as a source of inaccuracy in self-report data (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Maniaci & Rogge, 2014; Meade & Craig, 2012). Whereas previous studies have focused on IER as a methodological nuisance, the current studies examined IER as a substantive variable. Specifically, we hypothesized that IER is a reflection of enduring individual differences. In Study 1, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency over the course of 13 months; in Studies 2 and 3, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency across multiple research situations; in Study 4, we found that acquaintance-reported conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability were each negatively related to IER; and in Study 5, we found that IER was related to college grade point average and class absences. Together, these 5 studies suggest that IER is in part a manifestation of enduring individual differences.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 229
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PSYCHOMETRICS INTRO
[2]   Random and Systematic Error Effects of Insomnia on Survey Behavior [J].
Barber, Larissa K. ;
Barnes, Christopher M. ;
Carlson, Kevin D. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (04) :616-649
[3]   An Other Perspective on Personality: Meta-Analytic Integration of Observers' Accuracy and Predictive Validity [J].
Connelly, Brian S. ;
Ones, Deniz S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (06) :1092-1122
[4]  
Costa PT., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
[5]   Class Attendance in College: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship of Class Attendance With Grades and Student Characteristics [J].
Crede, Marcus ;
Roch, Sylvia G. ;
Kieszczynka, Urszula M. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (02) :272-295
[6]  
Curran P. G., J EXPT SOCI IN PRESS
[7]   Best practice recommendations for data screening [J].
Desimone, Justin A. ;
Harms, P. D. ;
Desimone, Alice J. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 36 (02) :171-181
[8]   Role of test motivation in intelligence testing [J].
Duckworth, Angela Lee ;
Quinn, Patrick D. ;
Lynam, Donald R. ;
Loeber, Rolf ;
Stouthamer-Loeber, Magda .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (19) :7716-7720
[9]   Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course [J].
Fraley, RC ;
Roberts, BW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (01) :60-74
[10]   EXPLORATIONS IN BEHAVIORAL CONSISTENCY - PROPERTIES OF PERSONS, SITUATIONS, AND BEHAVIORS [J].
FUNDER, DC ;
COLVIN, CR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 60 (05) :773-794