EATING AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL AMONG CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS INSULIN

被引:1
|
作者
Miller, Eli E. [1 ]
Lalla, Mumtu [2 ]
Zaidi, Alyssa [2 ]
Elgash, May [2 ]
Zhao, Huaqing [3 ]
Rubin, Daniel J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Sect Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Dept Clin Sdences, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[4] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Sect Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
关键词
CRITICAL ILLNESS; VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; INFUSION; HYPERGLYCEMIA; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.4158/EP-2019-0095
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Consensus guidelines recommend that intensive care unit (ICU) patients with blood glucose (BG) levels >180 mg/dL receive continuous intravenous insulin (CII). The effectiveness of CII at controlling BG levels among patients who are eating relative to those who are eating nothing by mouth (nil per os; NPO) has not been described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 260 adult patients (156 eating, 104 NPO) admitted to an ICU between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who received CII. Patients were excluded for a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, admission to an obstetrics service, or receiving continuous enteral or parenteral nutrition. Results: Among 22 baseline characteristics, the proportion of patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment (GCTx) (17.3% eating, 37.5% NPO; P<.001) and APACHE II score (15.0 +/- 7.5 eating, 17.9 +/- 7.9 NPO; P = .004) were significantly different between eating and NTO patients. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of patient-day weighted mean BG overall (153 +/- 8 mg/dL eating, 156 +/- 7 mg/dL NPO; P = .73), or day-by-day BG (P = .37) adjusted for GCTx and APACHE score. Surprisingly, there was a significant difference in the distribution of BG values, with eating patients having a higher percentage of BG readings in the recommended range of 140 to 180 mg/dL. However, eating patients showed greater glucose variability (coefficient of variation 23.1 +/- 1.0 eating, 21.2 +/- 1.0 NPO; P = .034). Conclusion: Eating may not adversely affect BG levels of ICU patients receiving CII. Whether or not prandial insulin improves glycemic control in this setting should be studied.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
    Xu, Biao
    Jiang, Wei
    Wang, Chun-Yao
    Weng, Li
    Hu, Xiao-Yun
    Peng, Jin-Min
    Du, Bin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 130 (17) : 2041 - 2049
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin in critically ill patients
    Abdulrahman I. Alshaya
    Jeremy R. DeGrado
    Kenneth E. Lupi
    Paul M. Szumita
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 146 - 152
  • [43] Another Target for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Children?
    Gaies, Michael
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (07) : 674 - 675
  • [44] Guideline-Concordant Insulin Infusion Initiation Among Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis
    Bosch, Nicholas A.
    Fantasia, Kathryn L.
    Modzelewski, Katherine L.
    Alexanian, Sara M.
    Walkey, Allan J.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (06) : 552 - 560
  • [45] Moderate glycemic control safe in critically ill adult burn patients: A 15 year cohort study
    Stoecklin, Patricia
    Delodder, Frederik
    Pantet, Olivier
    Berger, Mette M.
    BURNS, 2016, 42 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [46] Second pilot trials of the STAR-Liege protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients
    Penning, Sophie
    Le Compte, Aaron J.
    Massion, Paul
    Moorhead, Katherine T.
    Pretty, Christopher G.
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Suhaimi, Fatanah
    Desaive, Thomas
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2012, 11
  • [47] Adoption and implementation of the original strict glycemic control guideline is feasible and safe in adult critically ill patients
    Schultz, M. J.
    Harmsen, R. E.
    Korevaar, J. C.
    Abu-Hanna, A.
    Houckgeest, F. Van Braam
    Van Der Sluijs, J. P.
    Spronk, P. E.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2012, 78 (09) : 982 - 995
  • [48] Outcome benefit of intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill: Insulin dose versus glycemic control
    Van den Berghe, G
    Wouters, PJ
    Bouillon, R
    Weekers, F
    Verwaest, C
    Schetz, M
    Vlasselaers, D
    Ferdinande, P
    Lamers, P
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (02) : 359 - 366
  • [49] A liberal glycemic target in critically ill patients with poorly controlled diabetes?
    Gunst, Jan
    Van den Berghe, Greet
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4
  • [50] Intravenous Insulin Infusion Protocol Compared With Subcutaneous Insulin for the Management of Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Adults
    Tran, Kenneth K.
    Kibert, Jeffery L., II
    Telford, Evan D.
    Franck, Andrew J.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2019, 53 (09) : 894 - 898