EATING AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL AMONG CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS INSULIN

被引:1
|
作者
Miller, Eli E. [1 ]
Lalla, Mumtu [2 ]
Zaidi, Alyssa [2 ]
Elgash, May [2 ]
Zhao, Huaqing [3 ]
Rubin, Daniel J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Sect Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Dept Clin Sdences, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[4] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Sect Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
关键词
CRITICAL ILLNESS; VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; INFUSION; HYPERGLYCEMIA; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.4158/EP-2019-0095
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Consensus guidelines recommend that intensive care unit (ICU) patients with blood glucose (BG) levels >180 mg/dL receive continuous intravenous insulin (CII). The effectiveness of CII at controlling BG levels among patients who are eating relative to those who are eating nothing by mouth (nil per os; NPO) has not been described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 260 adult patients (156 eating, 104 NPO) admitted to an ICU between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who received CII. Patients were excluded for a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, admission to an obstetrics service, or receiving continuous enteral or parenteral nutrition. Results: Among 22 baseline characteristics, the proportion of patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment (GCTx) (17.3% eating, 37.5% NPO; P<.001) and APACHE II score (15.0 +/- 7.5 eating, 17.9 +/- 7.9 NPO; P = .004) were significantly different between eating and NTO patients. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of patient-day weighted mean BG overall (153 +/- 8 mg/dL eating, 156 +/- 7 mg/dL NPO; P = .73), or day-by-day BG (P = .37) adjusted for GCTx and APACHE score. Surprisingly, there was a significant difference in the distribution of BG values, with eating patients having a higher percentage of BG readings in the recommended range of 140 to 180 mg/dL. However, eating patients showed greater glucose variability (coefficient of variation 23.1 +/- 1.0 eating, 21.2 +/- 1.0 NPO; P = .034). Conclusion: Eating may not adversely affect BG levels of ICU patients receiving CII. Whether or not prandial insulin improves glycemic control in this setting should be studied.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Glycemic control in critically ill surgical patients: risks and benefits
    Mukherjee, Kaushik
    Albaugh, Vance L.
    Richards, Justin E.
    Rumbaugh, Kelli A.
    May, Addison K.
    OPEN ACCESS SURGERY, 2015, 8 : 27 - 42
  • [22] Intravenous insulin nomogram improves blood glucose control in the critically ill
    Brown, G
    Dodek, P
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (09) : 1714 - 1719
  • [23] Glycemic Control in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Coburn, John A.
    Coto-Yglesias, Fernando
    Dzyubak, Svitlana
    Hazem, Ahmad
    Lane, Melanie A.
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 97 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [24] Improvement of glycemic control in critically ill patients using online identification of insulin sensitivity
    Wu, Sha
    Furutani, Eiko
    2017 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (CCTA 2017), 2017, : 548 - 553
  • [25] First pilot trial of the STAR-Liege protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients
    Penning, Sophie
    Le Compte, Aaron J.
    Moorhead, Katherine T.
    Desaive, Thomas
    Massion, Paul
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2012, 108 (02) : 844 - 859
  • [26] Glycemic control in critically ill patients with or without diabetes
    Ka Man Fong
    Shek Yin Au
    George Wing Yiu Ng
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [27] Understanding glycemic control in the critically ill: three domains are better than one
    Krinsley, James S.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (03) : 382 - 384
  • [28] Glycemic control in the critically ill: Less is more
    Alhatemi, Ghaith
    Aldiwani, Haider
    Alhatemi, Rafal
    Hussein, Marwah
    Mahdai, Suzan
    Seyoum, Berhane
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 89 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [29] Low-carbohydrate, high-fat enteral formulas for managing glycemic control in patients who are critically ill: A review of the evidence
    Burslem, Ryan
    Rigassio Radler, Diane
    Parker, Anna
    Zelig, Rena
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 37 (01) : 68 - 80
  • [30] The impact of premorbid diabetic status on the relationship between the three domains of glycemic control and mortality in critically ill patients
    Krinsley, James S.
    Meyfroidt, Geert
    van den Berghe, Greet
    Egi, Mori
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2012, 15 (02) : 151 - 160